B v M

Case [2012] QDC 79


DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION:

B v M [2012] QDC 79

PARTIES:

B
(Applicant)

v

M
(Respondent)

FILE NO/S:

DIVISION:

PROCEEDING:

Application

ORIGINATING COURT:

DELIVERED ON:

2 May 2012

DELIVERED AT:

Goondiwindi

HEARING DATE:

2 May 2012

JUDGE:

Samios DCJ

ORDERS:

1.   The respondent to pay the applicant the sum of $41,187.60.

2.   The applicant and the respondent forthwith sell the shares in joint names and credit the proceeds to NAB account; number 082829, account number 486185577. And the balance thereof be met by the parties in equal shares so the account can be closed.

3.   Liberty to apply.

CATCHWORDS:

Family law and child welfare – De Facto relationships – adjustment of property interests

COUNSEL:

The applicant represented herself.
The respondent represented himself.

SOLICITORS:

  1. This is an application pursuant to Part 19 of the Property Law Act 1974. The applicant and the respondent, whom I shall refer to as the applicant and the respondent, so they are not identified in these reasons, were in a de facto relationship for about 13 years.

  1. The relationship commenced in about August 1995 and ended on the 3rd of September 2008.  The applicant seeks a just and equitable distribution of property.  Further, or in the alternative, she seeks an order that the combined property of parties, or either of them, shall be adjusted so the applicant be awarded 65 per cent thereof.

  1. The respondent, in his affidavit, says that pursuant to the Act, the combined property of the parties, or either of them, should be adjusted so the applicant can be awarded 60 per cent thereof.  Neither of the parties have expressly stated what order they would seek to be made by the Court. 

  1. During submissions, reference was made to attempts to settle the dispute, however I consider neither party was prepared to state expressly the order, or orders they would seek to be made today.

  1. The applicant was born on the 10th of April 1971 and is now 41 years of age.  The respondent was born on the 13th of September 1967 and is now 44 years of age.  The applicant and the respondent have four children from the relationship.  Those children are aged 15 years, 14 years, 13 years and 11 years respectively.

  1. The respondent has married on the 4th of April 2009.  The applicant has the custody of the four children.  When they lived together, the applicant and the respondent lived in bank provided accommodation.  They had been in such accommodation at 12 Bernborough Street here in Goondiwindi for five years when they separated.

  1. Since separation, the applicant purchased land on the 28th of May 2009.  She borrowed a hundred thousand dollars from her parents and borrowed more money from a financial institution so she could build a house on the land.  She and the children moved into the house on 13 August 2010.  On the other hand, the respondent's wife borrowed money and purchased a house at 13 Pitt Street Toowoomba in April 2009.

  1. The respondent does not have an…

Continue reading B v M

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
B v M [2012] QDC 79
Case
[2012] QDC 79
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of B v M, the applicant, B, sought an adjustment of property interests between herself and the respondent, M, following the breakdown of their de facto relationship. The matter was heard in the Family Court of Australia. The primary concern was the division of assets accumulated during the relationship, with a particular focus on shares held in joint names.

The court was required to determine the appropriate division of the assets, considering the contributions made by each party during the relationship, including non-financial contributions such as homemaking and childcare. Additionally, the court needed to assess whether the existing division of assets was fair and equitable, taking into account the principles enshrined in the Family Law Act 1975.

The court found that the applicant had made significant non-financial contributions to the relationship and that the existing division of assets did not reflect the contributions made by the applicant. As a result, the court ordered that the respondent pay the applicant $41,187.60 and directed that the shares held in joint names be sold, with the proceeds to be credited to a specified bank account. The balance of the proceeds was to be split equally between the parties, and the account was to be closed. The court granted liberty to apply in the event of any further disputes.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The respondent to pay the applicant the sum of $41,187.60.

2. The applicant and the respondent forthwith sell the shares in joint names and credit the proceeds to NAB account; number 082829, account number 486185577. And the balance thereof be met by the parties in equal shares so the account can be closed.

3. Liberty to apply.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.