Aznavour Pty Ltd v City of Mandurah
Case
•
[2002] WASC 95
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Aznavour Pty Ltd v City of Mandurah [2002] WASC 95
[2002] WASC 95
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The applicants, Aznavour Pty Ltd, Howson Nominees Pty Ltd, and Universal Pty Ltd, sought orders nisi for certiorari and a declaration against the City of Mandurah regarding its approval of a development proposal for a new shopping centre on the Centro Land, adjacent to the Aznavour Shopping Centre. The City of Mandurah had granted conditional approval on 20 February 2001, subject to a Traffic Management Plan being prepared. The applicants contended that subsequent resolutions on 25 October 2001 varied or revoked the original approval and conditions, rendering them invalid. The City of Mandurah and Centro Properties argued that the resolutions did not alter the original approval and conditions.
The court found that the terms of the resolutions of 25 October were arguable as a variation or revocation of the original approval and conditions. The resolutions appeared to allow the opening of Stage 1 of the Centro development without the required Traffic Management Plan being prepared, conflicting with the condition imposed on 20 February 2001. The court also found that the resolutions may lack finality, as they left open for later determination a fundamental aspect of the consent. The court concluded that the applicants had established an arguable case for the relief sought and granted the orders nisi for certiorari and a declaration.
The final orders were to be made on the return of the order nisi.
The court found that the terms of the resolutions of 25 October were arguable as a variation or revocation of the original approval and conditions. The resolutions appeared to allow the opening of Stage 1 of the Centro development without the required Traffic Management Plan being prepared, conflicting with the condition imposed on 20 February 2001. The court also found that the resolutions may lack finality, as they left open for later determination a fundamental aspect of the consent. The court concluded that the applicants had established an arguable case for the relief sought and granted the orders nisi for certiorari and a declaration.
The final orders were to be made on the return of the order nisi.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Planning & Development Law
Legal Concepts
-
Planning Approval
-
Conditions on Planning Approval
-
Variation of Planning Conditions
-
Certiorari
-
Finality of Consent
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
HOLCIM (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD and CITY OF VICNENT [2017] WASAT 82
Cases Citing This Decision
12
HANSON CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS PTY LTD and CITY OF VINCENT
[2017] WASAT 81
HOLCIM (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD and CITY OF VICNENT
[2017] WASAT 82
CITY OF BELMONT and TOWN OF VICTORIA PARK
[2014] WASAT 46