AYARI & AGASSI

Case [2020] FamCA 1111


FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

AYARI & AGASSI [2020] FamCA 1111

FAMILY LAW – COSTS – Application filed by the husband that the wife pay his costs of the proceedings as agreed or assessed – Order that wife pay the husbands legal costs of the proceedings as agreed or as assessed under the rules on a party/party basis – Order that wife pay the sum of $2,200 being the fees of the husband’s barrister on the Costs Application or a portion of the fees of the husbands barrister

FAMIL LAW – PROCEDURAL – Application filed by husband seeking a discharge of interim orders made 14 September 2016 – Application granted interim orders 5 and 6 made 14 September 2020 discharged and vacated

Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 117
Penfold v Penfold (1980) FLC 90-800
PBF as Child Representative for AF (Legal Aid Commission of Tasmania) & Ors [2005] FamCA 158
Cachia v Hanes (1994) 179 CLR 403
APPLICANT: Mr Ayari
RESPONDENT: Ms Agassi
FILE NUMBER: SYC 5697 of 2016
DATE DELIVERED: 24 November 2020
PLACE DELIVERED: Hobart
PLACE HEARD: Hobart
JUDGMENT OF: Benjamin J
HEARING DATE: 24 November 2020

REPRESENTATION

COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: Mr Cairns
SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT:
COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: In person
SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT:

Orders

  1. Ms Agassi (‘the wife’) pay the legal costs of Mr Ayari (‘the husband’) in these proceedings.

  2. Such costs be as agreed or as assessed under the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth) and are to be calculated on a party/party basis.

  3. The wife shall, within 90 days from the date of this order, pay the sum of two thousand two hundred dollars ($2,200) being the fees of the husband’s barrister, or a portion of the fees of the husband’s barrister, on the costs application and that the costs otherwise sought in relation to the costs application are discharged.

  4. All outstanding applications are dismissed.

IT IS CERTIFIED

  1. Pursuant to Rule 19.50 of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth) it was reasonable to engage counsel to attend.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Ayari & Agassi has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for Judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth).

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT HOBART

FILE NUMBER:  SYC 5697 of 2016

MR AYARI

Applicant

And

MS AGASSI

Respondent

EX TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

INTRODUCTION

  1. Ms Agassi (‘the wife’), and Mr Ayari (‘the husband’), have been engaged in proceedings in this Court and/or the Federal Circuit Court since 2016.  Those proceedings were heard by me over 16 March, 4, 6, 7, 8, 11 of…

Continue reading AYARI & AGASSI

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
AYARI & AGASSI [2020] FamCA 1111
Case
[2020] FamCA 1111
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of *Ayari & Agassi*, Benjamin J of the Family Court of Australia considered an application by the husband for the wife to pay his costs of the proceedings. The wife had also filed an application seeking the discharge of interim orders made on 14 September 2016.

The primary legal issues before the court were whether the wife should be ordered to pay the husband's legal costs, and if so, on what basis. Additionally, the court was required to determine the quantum of those costs, specifically in relation to the fees of the husband's barrister for the costs application, and whether it was reasonable to engage counsel for that application.

Benjamin J ordered that the wife pay the husband's legal costs of the proceedings on a party/party basis, to be agreed or assessed under the *Family Law Rules 2004* (Cth). The wife was also ordered to pay $2,200 towards the fees of the husband's barrister for the costs application, with any further costs sought in relation to that application being discharged. The court certified that it was reasonable to engage counsel to attend the costs application pursuant to Rule 19.50 of the *Family Law Rules 2004* (Cth). All outstanding applications were dismissed.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

Ms Agassi (‘the wife’) pay the legal costs of Mr Ayari (‘the husband’) in these proceedings.

2.

Such costs be as agreed or as assessed under the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth) and are to be calculated on a party/party basis.

3.

The wife shall, within 90 days from the date of this order, pay the sum of two thousand two hundred dollars ($2,200) being the fees of the husband’s barrister, or a portion of the fees of the husband’s barrister, on the costs application and that the costs otherwise sought in relation to the costs application are discharged.

4.

All outstanding applications are dismissed.

IT IS CERTIFIED

5.

Pursuant to Rule 19.50 of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth) it was reasonable to engage counsel to attend.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.