FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| AYARI & AGASSI | [2020] FamCA 1111 |
| FAMILY LAW – COSTS – Application filed by the husband that the wife pay his costs of the proceedings as agreed or assessed – Order that wife pay the husbands legal costs of the proceedings as agreed or as assessed under the rules on a party/party basis – Order that wife pay the sum of $2,200 being the fees of the husband’s barrister on the Costs Application or a portion of the fees of the husbands barrister FAMIL LAW – PROCEDURAL – Application filed by husband seeking a discharge of interim orders made 14 September 2016 – Application granted interim orders 5 and 6 made 14 September 2020 discharged and vacated |
| Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 117 |
| Penfold v Penfold (1980) FLC 90-800 PBF as Child Representative for AF (Legal Aid Commission of Tasmania) & Ors [2005] FamCA 158 Cachia v Hanes (1994) 179 CLR 403 |
| APPLICANT: | Mr Ayari |
| RESPONDENT: | Ms Agassi |
| FILE NUMBER: | SYC | 5697 | of | 2016 |
| DATE DELIVERED: | 24 November 2020 |
| PLACE DELIVERED: | Hobart |
| PLACE HEARD: | Hobart |
| JUDGMENT OF: | Benjamin J |
| HEARING DATE: | 24 November 2020 |
REPRESENTATION
| COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: | Mr Cairns |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: |
| COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: | In person |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: |
Orders
Ms Agassi (‘the wife’) pay the legal costs of Mr Ayari (‘the husband’) in these proceedings.
Such costs be as agreed or as assessed under the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth) and are to be calculated on a party/party basis.
The wife shall, within 90 days from the date of this order, pay the sum of two thousand two hundred dollars ($2,200) being the fees of the husband’s barrister, or a portion of the fees of the husband’s barrister, on the costs application and that the costs otherwise sought in relation to the costs application are discharged.
All outstanding applications are dismissed.
IT IS CERTIFIED
Pursuant to Rule 19.50 of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth) it was reasonable to engage counsel to attend.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Ayari & Agassi has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for Judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth).
| FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT HOBART |
FILE NUMBER: SYC 5697 of 2016
| MR AYARI |
Applicant
And
| MS AGASSI |
Respondent
EX TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
INTRODUCTION
Ms Agassi (‘the wife’), and Mr Ayari (‘the husband’), have been engaged in proceedings in this Court and/or the Federal Circuit Court since 2016. Those proceedings were heard by me over 16 March, 4, 6, 7, 8, 11 of…
Continue reading AYARI & AGASSI
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- AYARI & AGASSI [2020] FamCA 1111
- Case
- [2020] FamCA 1111
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the wife should be ordered to pay the husband's legal costs, and if so, on what basis. Additionally, the court was required to determine the quantum of those costs, specifically in relation to the fees of the husband's barrister for the costs application, and whether it was reasonable to engage counsel for that application.
Benjamin J ordered that the wife pay the husband's legal costs of the proceedings on a party/party basis, to be agreed or assessed under the *Family Law Rules 2004* (Cth). The wife was also ordered to pay $2,200 towards the fees of the husband's barrister for the costs application, with any further costs sought in relation to that application being discharged. The court certified that it was reasonable to engage counsel to attend the costs application pursuant to Rule 19.50 of the *Family Law Rules 2004* (Cth). All outstanding applications were dismissed.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
Ms Agassi (‘the wife’) pay the legal costs of Mr Ayari (‘the husband’) in these proceedings.
2.
Such costs be as agreed or as assessed under the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth) and are to be calculated on a party/party basis.
3.
The wife shall, within 90 days from the date of this order, pay the sum of two thousand two hundred dollars ($2,200) being the fees of the husband’s barrister, or a portion of the fees of the husband’s barrister, on the costs application and that the costs otherwise sought in relation to the costs application are discharged.
4.
All outstanding applications are dismissed.
IT IS CERTIFIED
5.
Pursuant to Rule 19.50 of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth) it was reasonable to engage counsel to attend.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.