AXR (A PSEUDONYM)
v
THE KING
[2023] HCASL 85
S164/2022
S165/2022
S166/2022
The applicant seeks special leave to appeal from a decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales (Garling, Adamson and Button JJ) dismissing his appeal against sentence. The applications raise no question of principle. In addition, the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal is not attended with sufficient doubt to warrant a grant of special leave.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the applications.
S.J. Gageler J.S. Gleeson 18 May 2023
Continue reading Axr (a pseudonym) v The King
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Axr (a pseudonym) v The King [2023] HCASL 85
- Case
- [2023] HCASL 85
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal matters that needed to be resolved by the court included whether the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal contained any errors of principle or if it was attended with sufficient doubt to warrant a grant of special leave. The court needed to assess the merits of the applicant's appeal and determine if there were any grounds for the High Court to intervene. Furthermore, the court had to examine if the Court of Criminal Appeal's decision was in line with the legal principles and precedents set by the High Court.
In its decision, the court found that the applications for special leave to appeal did not raise any questions of principle. The court also concluded that the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal was not attended with sufficient doubt to warrant a grant of special leave. Consequently, the court dismissed the applications for special leave to appeal. The court's reasoning was based on the assessment of the merits of the applicant's appeal and the absence of any significant legal errors or doubt in the Court of Criminal Appeal's decision. Ultimately, the High Court decided that there were no grounds for the applicant to appeal the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal.
Pursuant to rule 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), the Registrar was directed to draw up, sign, and seal an order dismissing the applications. The decision was made on 18 May 2023, by S.J. Gageler and J.S. Gleeson. The dismissal of the applications means that the applicant's appeal against sentence will not be further considered by the High Court.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.