Re: AVEL PTY. LIMITED; CAPCOM CO. LIMITED and TAD CORPORATION LIMITED
And: JONATHAN WELLS
No. G816 of 1991
FED No. 461
Intellectual Property
(1992) AIPC 90-901
(1992) 108 ALR 97
(1992) 23 IPR 353
COURT
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
Sheppard(1), Lee(1) and Hill(1) JJ.
CATCHWORDS
Intellectual Property - copyright - parallel importation - circuit layouts - importation of eligible layouts for video games - eligible layouts containing substantial parts of computer programs, the copyright in which was owned by one or other of the appellants - whether importation of such eligible layouts constituted an infringment of appellants' copyright in computer programs.
Circuit Layouts Act 1989, ss. 5, 8, 11, 16, 17, 19 and 24.
Copyright Act 1968, ss. 37 and 38.
HEARING
SYDNEY
#DATE 30:6:1992
Counsel and Solicitors for Applicant: D.F. Jackson QC with R.J. Webb
instructed by Kemp, Strang and Chippindall
Counsel and Solicitors for Respondent: D.K. Catterns with J.V. Nicholas
for Respondent: instructed by Corrs Chambers
Westgarth
ORDER
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:-
1. The appeal be dismissed.
2. The appellants pay to the respondent his costs of the appeal.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
JUDGE1
The appellants, Avel Pty Limited ("Avel"), Capcom Co Limited ("Capcom") and Tad Corporation Limited ("Tad") are the applicants in proceedings against the respondent, Mr Jonathan Wells ("Mr Wells") in which they sought, inter alia, an injunction against Mr Wells, restraining him, inter alia, from importing, selling or offering for sale certain electronic video games in kit form. The relevant games are referred to as "Carrier Airwing", "Final Fight", "Street Fighter II" and "Blood Brothers". Each of the game kits comprises a printed circuit board ("PCB"), into which are plugged certain memory storage devices, an operator's manual and certain stickers.
In relation to the game kits for the first three games, Capcom is the owner pursuant to the Copyright Act 1968 ("the Copyright Act") of copyright in three literary works being:
(a) the computer programmes contained in the memory storage devices in integrated circuit form which are fitted to the PCBs;
(b) the written materials contained in the operator's manuals included in the kit; and
(c) the written materials included on stickers designed to be placed on the exterior of the video game cabinet into which the PCB is installed for use.
Capcom is also the owner, pursuant to the Copyright Act, of copyright in artistic works being the drawings and diagrams contained in the operator manuals included in the game kits, and the drawings and diagrams reproduced on the stickers.
In respect of the Blood Brothers game kit, Tad is the owner, nter alia, of the copyright in literary works being the computer programmes contained in the memory storage devices in integrated circuit form fitted to the PCBs. Tad is also the owner of copyright in the written materials contained in the operator's manuals, the written materials included on stickers…
Continue reading Avel Pty Ltd v Wells, J
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Avel Pty Ltd v Wells, J [1992] FCA 461
- Case
- [1992] FCA 461
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that the court had to decide were whether the importation of the circuit layouts constituted an infringement of the appellants' copyright in the computer programs, and if so, whether the importation of such eligible layouts was permissible under Australian copyright law. The court had to consider the extent to which the layout of a circuit could be protected by copyright and whether such protection extended to the importation of layouts that were substantially identical to those created by the appellants.
The court held that the importation of the circuit layouts did not constitute an infringement of the appellants' copyright in the computer programs. The court found that while the layout of a circuit could be protected by copyright, this protection did not extend to the importation of layouts that were substantially identical to those created by the appellants. The court held that the copyright in the computer programs did not extend to the layout of the circuits, and therefore, the importation of such layouts did not infringe the appellants' copyright. The appeal was dismissed, and the appellants were ordered to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal.
Orders
Orders of the court
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:-
1. The appeal be dismissed.
2. The appellants pay to the respondent his costs of the appeal.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.