Avant Insurance Ltd v Burnie

Link copied
Case Copied 59 min read

Court of Appeal


Supreme Court


New South Wales

  • Summary available
Medium Neutral Citation: Avant Insurance Ltd v Burnie [2021] NSWCA 272
Hearing dates: 11 June 2021
Decision date: 08 November 2021
Before: McCallum JA and Simpson AJA at [1];
Emmett AJA at [40]
Decision:

(1) Leave to appeal granted.

(2) Appeal allowed.

(3) Orders made by the primary judge set aside.

(4) In lieu thereof, Joinder Motion dismissed with costs.

(5) Respondent to pay Applicant’s costs of the appeal.

(6) If otherwise entitled, Respondent to have an order under the Suitors Fund Act 1951 (NSW).

Catchwords:

INSURANCE – Appeal from decision joining insurer to proceedings – Whether there was an insured liability – Where insured gave no notice of facts that might give rise to claim – Whether contractual obligation to give notice – Whether breach of obligation cured by statute

Legislation Cited:

Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth), s 15AB

Civil Liability (Third Party Claims Against Insurers) Act 2017 (NSW), ss 3, 4, 5

Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth), ss 40, 54

Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 (NSW)

Sale of Goods Act1923 (NSW)

Suitors Fund Act 1951 (NSW)

Cases Cited:

CA & MEC McInally Nominees Pty Ltd v HTW Valuers (Brisbane) Pty Ltd [2009] 2 Qd R 1; [2001] QSC 388

FAI General Insurance Company Limited v Australian Hospital Care Pty Ltd (2001) 204 CLR 641; [2001] HCA 38

Gosford City Council v GIO General Ltd (2003) 56 NSWLR 542; [2003] NSWCA 34

Guild Insurance Ltd v Hepburn [2014] NSWCA 400

Newcastle City Council v GIO General Ltd (1997) 191 CLR 85; [1997] HCA 53

Tara Burnie v Dr Leslie Blackstock [2020] NSWDC 452

Texts Cited:

Australian Law Reform Commission, Insurance Contracts (Report No 20, 1982)

Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Avant Insurance Ltd (Applicant)
Tara Burnie (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
M Windsor SC, R Gambi (Applicant)
A D Campbell, R Wathukarage (Respondent)

Solicitors:
Carter Newell Lawyers (Applicant)
Gerard Malouf & Partners (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2020/264543
Publication restriction: None
 Decision under appeal 
Court or tribunal:
District Court of New South Wales
Jurisdiction:
Civil
Citation:

[2020] NSWDC 452

Date of Decision:
14 August 2020
Before:
Strathdee DCJ
File Number(s):
2018/229812

HEADNOTE

[This headnote is not to be read as part of the judgment]

The applicant, Avant Insurance Ltd (Avant), sought leave to appeal from a decision of the District Court granting leave under section 5 of the Civil Liability (Third Party Claims Against Insurers) Act 2017 (NSW) to join Avant to proceedings between Ms Tara Burnie and Mr Leslie Blackstock. In those proceedings Ms Burnie sought damages for personal injury allegedly suffered as a result of Mr Blackstock’s alleged medical negligence. At the time of the alleged negligence Mr Blackstock held a Practitioner Indemnity Insurance policy issued by Avant. However, that policy, which was framed as a “claims made and notified” policy, expired without Mr Blackstock notifying Avant of any claim by Ms Burnie or even facts that might give rise to such a claim. Avant…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Avant Insurance Ltd v Burnie and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2021] NSWCA 272
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Avant Insurance Ltd appealed to the Court of Appeal of New South Wales against a primary judge's decision to join Avant Insurance Ltd as a defendant in proceedings brought by Mr. Burnie. Mr. Burnie sought to join Avant as the insurer of a medical practitioner, Dr. Alistair, in a claim alleging professional negligence. The central dispute concerned whether Dr. Alistair had provided notice to Avant of facts that might give rise to a claim, as required by the insurance policy, and whether any breach of this obligation was excused by statute.

The Court of Appeal was required to determine whether there was an "insured liability" within the meaning of the relevant legislation, specifically the *Suitors Fund Act 1951* (NSW), which would permit the joinder of the insurer. This involved considering whether Dr. Alistair had breached his contractual obligation to notify Avant of circumstances that might lead to a claim, and if so, whether that breach was cured by any statutory provision, thereby preserving Avant's liability under the policy.

The Court found that Dr. Alistair had failed to provide notice to Avant of facts that might give rise to a claim, as required by the policy. The Court held that the statutory provisions relied upon by Mr. Burnie did not operate to cure this breach. Consequently, there was no "insured liability" on the part of Avant at the time the joinder motion was heard. The Court allowed the appeal, set aside the primary judge's orders, and dismissed the joinder motion with costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) Leave to appeal granted.

(2) Appeal allowed.

(3) Orders made by the primary judge set aside.

(4) In lieu thereof, Joinder Motion dismissed with costs.

(5) Respondent to pay Applicant’s costs of the appeal.

(6) If otherwise entitled, Respondent to have an order under the Suitors Fund Act 1951 (NSW).

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.