Australian Consumer and Competition Commission v Camavit Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2013] FCA 1397
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Australian Consumer and Competition Commission v Camavit Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 1397
[2013] FCA 1397
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Australian Consumer and Competition Commission (ACCC) brought proceedings against Camavit Pty Ltd, a Harvey Norman franchisee, for making misleading and deceptive representations to consumers regarding their rights under the Australian Consumer Law (ACL). Camavit admitted to making representations that it had no obligation to provide remedies for faulty goods, contrary to sections 18 and 29(1)(m) of the ACL. The court accepted the parties' agreed facts and submissions and made orders accordingly. The orders include declarations of contravention, an injunction preventing similar representations, a requirement for Camavit to display a summary of consumer rights, and a compliance program to be implemented by Camavit. A pecuniary penalty of $32,000 was also imposed. The court considered factors such as the nature and extent of the contravention, the absence of previous contraventions, and the company's cooperation with the ACCC in determining the penalty.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Consumer Law
Legal Concepts
-
Misrepresentation
-
Consumer Guarantee Provisions
-
Misleading or Deceptive Conduct
-
Refund
-
Remedy
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Australian Competition And Consumer Commission v Bunavit Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 6
Cases Citing This Decision
6
Cases Cited
13
Statutory Material Cited
0