Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Equifax Australia Information Services and Solutions Pty Ltd

Case

[2018] FCA 1637

27 September 2018


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Equifax Australia Information Services and Solutions Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 1637 [2018] FCA 1637 27 September 2018

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Equifax Australia Information Services and Solutions Pty Ltd, the Federal Court considered the serious allegations of misleading or deceptive conduct and unconscionable conduct by a credit reporting body. Equifax, Australia's largest credit reporting entity, was found to have engaged in deceptive sales practices over the telephone, including misleading representations and false claims, aimed at selling fee-based credit reporting services to consumers. The case involved a period from 1 February 2016 to 10 October 2017, during which Equifax representatives were incentivized by commissions to aggressively promote and sell these paid packages to consumers.

The court had to determine the appropriate penalty for these breaches of the Australian Consumer Law and assess whether the agreed penalty between the parties was appropriate, given the serious nature of the conduct. The legal issues included whether the agreed penalty adequately reflected the gravity of the conduct and whether the consumer redress scheme proposed by the parties was workable. The court considered the principles and factors relevant to setting penalties, including the deterrent and remedial objectives, and took into account the policy considerations highlighted by the High Court in Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate.

The court found that although it would have imposed a higher penalty in the absence of an agreement between the parties, it was satisfied that the agreed penalty was appropriate given the comprehensive consumer redress scheme. The court also noted some concerns about the effectiveness of the redress scheme but concluded that it was consistent with the parties' intentions and the court's discretion. The court ultimately accepted the agreed penalty and consumer redress scheme, emphasising the importance of ensuring that the redress process was conducted as intended by the parties and the court.

The final orders included the imposition of a penalty on Equifax and the implementation of a consumer redress scheme, with a variation to ensure the process would be effective and transparent. The court's decision underscored the importance of penalising serious breaches of consumer law while also considering the broader objectives of deterrence and consumer protection.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Consumer Law

Legal Concepts

  • Consumer Law – contraventions of the Australian Consumer Law

  • Misleading or Deceptive Conduct

  • Unconscionable Conduct

  • Refund Process

  • Penalties