SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION:
Attorney-General v Fardon [2003] QSC 379
PARTIES:
RODNEY JON WELFORD, ATTORNEY-GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND
(applicant)
v
ROBERT JOHN FARDON
(respondent)FILE NO/S:
SC No 5346 of 2003
DIVISION:
Trial Division
DELIVERED ON:
6 November 2003
DELIVERED AT:
Brisbane
HEARING DATE:
27, 28, 29, 30 October 2003
JUDGE:
White J
ORDER:
Robert John Fardon be detained in custody for an indefinite term for control, care and treatment
CATCHWORDS:
STATUTES – ACTS OF PARLIAMENT – INTERPRETATION – STATUTORY POWERS AND DUTIES – EXERCISE – GENERAL MATTERS – Where respondent convicted of rape and sodomy – where respondent “serious sexual offender” for purposes of Dangerous Prisoners (Sexual Offenders) Act 2003 (Qld) – where respondent’s sentence expired – where Attorney-General made application to have respondent detained indefinitely – whether respondent is a “serious danger to the community” – whether court satisfied of this by acceptable, cogent evidence and to a high degree of probability
EVIDENCE – BURDEN OF PROOF, PRESUMPTIONS, AND WEIGHT AND SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE – GENERALLY – SUFFICIENCY – where applicant required to establish “to a high degree of probability” that respondent is a serious danger to the community – whether applicant satisfied requisite standard of proof
EVIDENCE – ADMISSIBILITY AND RELEVANCY – FACTS RELEVANT TO FACTS IN ISSUE – IN GENERAL – where issue is whether there is an “unacceptable risk” that respondent will commit a serious sexual offence – consideration of material relevant to fact in issue
Criminal Law Amendment Act 1945 (Qld), s 18
Dangerous Prisoners (Sexual Offenders) Act 2003 (Qld), s 5, s 8, s 11, s 13, s 14
Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 (Qld), Part 10Chester v The Queen (1988) 165 CLR 611, referred to
Coco v The Queen (1993-1994) 179 CLR 427, referred to
McGarry v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 121, referred to
Minister for Immigration & Multi Cultural & Indigenous Affairs v Applicant VFAD [2002] FCAFC 390, referred to
Neat Holdings Pty Ltd v Karajan Holdings Pty Ltd (1992) 110 ALR 449, considered
R v Secretary of State; Ex parte Khawaja [1984] AC 74, considered
Re Bolton & Anor; Ex parte Bean (1987) 162 CLR 514, referred to
Trobridge v Hardy (1955) 94 CLR 147, referred toCOUNSEL:
R V Hanson QC, with R W Campbell and M Maloney, for the applicant
S R Southwood QC, with P D Keyzer, for the respondentSOLICITORS:
Crown Solicitor for the applicant
Prisoners’ Legal Service for the respondent
The Attorney-General has applied to the court for an order pursuant to Division 3 of the Dangerous Prisoners (Sexual Offenders) Act 2003 that the respondent, Robert John Fardon, be detained in custody for an indefinite term for control, care and treatment.
The respondent was convicted of rape, sodomy and assault occasioning bodily harm on 30 June 1989 at Townsville and sentenced to 14 years imprisonment. That sentence expired on or about 30 June 2003. The Dangerous Prisoners (Sexual Offenders) Act 2003 (“the…
Continue reading Attorney-General v Fardon
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Attorney-General v Fardon [2003] QSC 379
- Case
- [2003] QSC 379
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Court examined the evidence presented and the statutory framework governing the Act. It held that the burden of proof lay with the Attorney-General to demonstrate that Fardon posed a serious danger to the community to a high degree of probability. The Court considered various pieces of evidence, including Fardon's criminal history, expert psychiatric assessments, and other relevant material. The Court found that the cumulative evidence provided a clear and convincing picture of Fardon's ongoing risk of reoffending, satisfying the high threshold required by the Act. Consequently, the Court was satisfied that Fardon was a serious danger to the community and ordered his detention in custody for an indefinite term for control, care, and treatment.
Orders
Orders of the court
Robert John Fardon be detained in custody for an indefinite term for control, care and treatment
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.