DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION: Atkinson v McCallum [2002] QDC 328 PARTIES: CHRISTOPHER PETER ATKINSON
Applicant
v
GARY WAYNE McCALLUM
RespondentFILE NO: 3218/02 DIVISION: Criminal jurisdiction PROCEEDING: Application ORIGINATING Brisbane COURT: DELIVERED ON: 10 December 2002 DELIVERED AT: Brisbane HEARING DATE: 18 October 2002 JUDGE: O’Sullivan DCJ ORDER: I order the respondent to pay to the applicant by way of
criminal compensation the sum of $24,750.00CATCHWORDS: Criminal compensation: head injury; loss of smell COUNSEL: SOLICITORS: Collas Moro Ross for the Applicant
This is an application for criminal compensation by Christopher Peter Atkinson, a 19 year old fork lift driver, following the conviction of the respondent Gary Wayne McCallum of assault occasioning bodily harm on 18 March 2000.
The respondent hit the applicant with a Brisbane City Council tree stake following an altercation and various verbal exchanges involving the applicant, the respondent and others.
| [3] | The applicant was hit on the back of the head and was rendered unconscious for some short time. He sustained a 6cm laceration to the occipital area. |
The applicant was admitted to Logan Hospital with what was noted as a “serious head injury” and concussion. A CT scan and an EEG revealed no particular injury capable of diagnosis. The applicant was discharged after three days.
When the applicant saw a general practitioner three weeks after the incident he was complaining of very bad headaches, being off balance, bad dizzy spells and one blackout whilst at the wheel of a car.
The applicant was referred to a neurologist and a report from Dr Boyle dated 13 December 2001 discounts epilepsy and expresses the opinion that the applicant “was suffering primarily from post-concussion syndrome with some superimposed syncopal episodes”.
Dr Scott Campbell, neurosurgeon has provided two reports, dated 15 April 2002 and 12 September 2002. At the time of the examination on 12 April 2002 the applicant was suffering from decreased short term memory and concentration, loss of sense of smell and hypersensitivity over the occipital area to “touch and bumps”. Dr Campbell diagnosed a head injury resulting in organic brain dysfunction, traumatic damage to the olfactory nerves as a result of the contre coup head injury, and sensory nerve damage due to scalp laceration. In his more recent report Dr Campbell diagnoses a 6% whole person impairment, 3% due to decreased short term memory, 2% to the loss of sense of smell and 1% to sensory nerve damage to the scalp.
Mr Stoker, clinical psychologist, provided a report dated 20 June 2002. He states that the behaviour of the applicant after the assault, his psychological history and Mr Stoker’s clinical testing are consistent with a psychological diagnosis of post traumatic stress disorder with delayed onset (diagnostic and statistical-manual – American Psychiatric Society DSM – IV). He also diagnosed a post-concussional disorder (DSM – IV). Mr Stoker opined that “On a 7 point scale the applicant’s degree of psychological pain and suffering was around 5”. The applicant needed 25- 30 sessions of cognitive behavioural therapy. “The…
Continue reading Atkinson v McCallum
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Atkinson v McCallum [2002] QDC 328
- Case
- [2002] QDC 328
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that Atkinson's loss of smell was a serious impairment, significantly impacting his quality of life. It was held that the injury was severe enough to meet the threshold for compensation under the Act. The court considered medical evidence regarding the impact of the injury and the potential for future deterioration. It also took into account Atkinson's age, lifestyle, and the nature of the loss, which was permanent and irreversible. The court concluded that the loss of smell constituted a significant injury warranting compensation.
In determining the amount of compensation, the court evaluated the evidence presented on Atkinson's medical condition, the effect on his daily life, and the likelihood of future complications. It considered Atkinson's age, employment prospects, and the overall impact on his ability to enjoy life. The court awarded Atkinson $24,750.00 in compensation, reflecting the severity of his injury and its impact on his life. The order mandated McCallum to pay the sum to Atkinson by way of criminal compensation.
Orders
Orders of the court
I order the respondent to pay to the applicant by way of
criminal compensation the sum of $24,750.00
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.