DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION:
Atkinson v Dimurro [2007] QDC 349
PARTIES:
DENIS JOHN ATKINSON
Applicant
V
PETER EDWARD DIMURRO
Respondent
FILE NO/S:
330/06
DIVISION:
Civil
PROCEEDING:
Application for criminal compensation
ORIGINATING COURT:
District Court, Southport
DELIVERED ON:
20 December 2007
DELIVERED AT:
Beenleigh
HEARING DATE:
27 November 2007
JUDGE:
Dearden DCJ
ORDER:
The respondent Peter Edward Dimurro pay the applicant Denis John Atkinson the sum of $33,750.
CATCHWORDS:
APPLICATION – Criminal Compensation – assault occasioning bodily harm while armed – fractured skull – mental or nervous shock
LEGISLATION:
Criminal Offence Victims Act 1995 (Qld) ss 22(4), 24, 25(7), 26
CASES:
R v Ward; ex parte Dooley [2001] 2 Qd R 436
Riddle v Coffey [2002] 133 A Crim R 220; [2002] QCA 337
COUNSEL:
Mr D. Love (Solicitor) for the applicant
No appearance for the respondent
SOLICITORS:
Dale and Fallu for the applicant
No appearance for the respondent
Introduction
The applicant Denis John Atkinson seeks compensation in respect of injuries suffered by him arising out of two incidents which occurred on 31 December 2003 at Woolloongabba, resulting in the respondent Peter Edward Dimurro pleading guilty before me in the District Court at Brisbane on 11 March 2005 to one count of common assault, and one count of assault occasioning bodily harm while armed. The respondent was sentenced to a six month intensive correction order in respect of each of the counts, with a special condition requiring him to undergo medical, psychological, psychiatric and/or other treatment or counselling, including as an inpatient, as directed by an authorised Corrective Services officer, in relation to alcohol management.
Facts
The offences occurred on New Year’s Eve 2003. The applicant was having a small party at his house. The applicant had about half a dozen friends there and the applicant’s 18 year old son also had some friends at the party. Between 8 and 8.30 pm, the respondent walked into the kitchen of the residence through the open front door. The respondent started talking to a person in the kitchen and the applicant assumed that the respondent was there because he was somebody’s friend. The respondent kept calling people by their wrong names, and when he was told that he had their names the wrong way around, the respondent got upset and started yelling and swearing. When the applicant asked the respondent to leave his house, the respondent stood up and punched the applicant several times around the area of his head (Count 1 – common assault).[1]
[1]Exhibit B (Submissions on sentence), p 4, Affidavit of David Love sworn 21 October 2005
Another man then grabbed the respondent and then pushed him against a wall. The respondent was then involved in a scuffle with other men at the party before being shuffled towards the front door and thrown down the stairs. During this process, the respondent’s T‑shirt was ripped. A short time later, the respondent returned to the house wearing a different T‑shirt and was leaning against the front fence. He was asked to…
Continue reading Atkinson v. Dimurro
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Atkinson v Dimurro [2007] QDC 349
- Case
- [2007] QDC 349
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to consider the extent of Atkinson's injuries and the impact of the assault on his physical and mental well-being. The legal issues revolved around the quantum of compensation to be awarded, taking into account the severity of the injuries, the nature of the assault, and the resulting impact on Atkinson's quality of life. The court also had to assess the appropriate amount for mental or nervous shock.
In its reasoning, the court acknowledged the significant impact of the assault on Atkinson's health and well-being. The court found that Atkinson was entitled to compensation for both the physical injuries and the mental or nervous shock he experienced. After considering the evidence presented, the court determined that the appropriate compensation for Atkinson was $33,750. The court found that this amount adequately reflected the harm Atkinson suffered and the impact on his life.
The court ordered that Peter Edward Dimurro pay Denis John Atkinson the sum of $33,750 as compensation for the injuries sustained during the assault. This order was made to provide Atkinson with the financial support necessary to address the consequences of the attack and to compensate him for the harm caused by Dimurro's actions.
Orders
Orders of the court
The respondent Peter Edward Dimurro pay the applicant Denis John Atkinson the sum of $33,750.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.