Court of Appeal
Supreme Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Aslan v Stepanoski (No 2) [2022] NSWCA 89 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 8 June 2022 Decision date: 08 June 2022 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1];
Gleeson JA at [15];
Payne JA at [16].Decision: Notice of motion dismissed with costs.
Catchwords: COSTS – application for special costs orders made after delivery of judgment – Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 36.16(3A) – principle of finality favours refusal of belated application
Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr 19.1, 36.16(1), 36.16(3A), 51.23
Cases Cited: Aktas v Westpac Banking Corporation Ltd (No 2) (2010) 241 CLR 570; [2010] HCA 47
Australian Conservation Foundation Inc v Forestry Commission of Tasmania (1988) 81 ALR 166
Autodesk Inc v Dyason (No 2) (1993) 176 CLR 300; [1993] HCA 6
Baulderstone Hornibrook Engineering Pty Limited v Gordian Runoff Limited (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 12
Fuller v Albert (No 2) [2021] NSWCA 183
Griffith v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (No 2) [2011] NSWCA 145
Hendriks v McGeoch [2008] NSWCA 53
Oikos Constructions Pty Ltd t/as Lars Fischer Construction v Ostin & Anor (No 2) [2021] NSWCA 98
Real Estate Property Management Pty Ltd v WaterCorp Investments Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCA 194
Wentworth v Woollahra Municipal Council (1982) 149 CLR 672; [1982] HCA 41
Category: Costs Parties: Mohammad Jamal Aslan (also known as Jim Aslan) (Appellant)
Tony Stepanoski (First Respondent)
Sonja Stepanoski (Second Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
L Chan / K Sharma (Appellant)
P Folino-Gallo (Respondents)
Redenbach Legal (Respondents)
File Number(s): 2020/237337 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal
- Court or tribunal:
- Supreme Court of New South Wales
- Jurisdiction:
- Equity
- Citation:
- Date of Decision:
- 11 December 2018;
28 October 2019;
24 February 2020;
16 July 2020- Before:
- Emmett AJA
- File Number(s):
- 2016/139580
Judgment
-
MACFARLAN JA: On 25 February 2022 the Court delivered a judgment on this appeal ([2022] NSWCA 24). It allowed the appeal and set aside the substantial judgment entered against the appellant at first instance and awarded the appellant judgment against the respondents for an undisputed amount of $50,000. The Court ordered the respondents to pay the appellant’s costs of the proceedings at first instance and on appeal.
-
By notice of motion filed and presumably served within 14 days of delivery of that judgment the respondents, notwithstanding their lack of success on the appeal, seek two special costs orders in their favour, neither of which were sought before judgment was delivered.
The first special costs order sought
-
First, the respondents seek an order that the appellant pay their costs of 10 hearing days at first instance which culminated in a preliminary judgment of the primary judge of 30 July 2018 ([2018] NSWSC 1160). By that judgment his Honour determined, in…
Continue reading Aslan v Stepanoski (No 2)
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Aslan v Stepanoski (No 2) [2022] NSWCA 89
- Case
- [2022] NSWCA 89
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Court was whether it should grant an application for special costs orders made pursuant to rule 36.16(3A) of the *Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005* (NSW) after the delivery of judgment. This rule permits the Court to make orders for costs, including special costs orders, after judgment has been given.
The Court considered the principle of finality in litigation, which generally favours the refusal of belated applications for costs. While acknowledging that rule 36.16(3A) allows for such applications, the Court found that the applicant had not demonstrated sufficient grounds to depart from the usual practice of determining costs at the time of judgment. The applicant's failure to provide a compelling reason for the delay in making the application weighed against its success.
The notice of motion seeking special costs orders was dismissed, and the applicant was ordered to pay the respondent's costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
Notice of motion dismissed with costs.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.