Jayatilake v Toyota Motor Corporation Australia Ltd
[2008] VSCA 167
Citation 1
…t, that medical opinion did not of itself provide answers to those questions.”[61] [60] Jayatilake v Toyota Motor Corporation Australia Ltd [2008] VSCA 167, par 17, per Ashley JA [61] Grech v Orica Australia Pty Ltd (2006) 14 VR 602, at 611, par 35 per Ashley JA…
Shock Records Pty Ltd v Jones
[2006] VSCA 180
Citation 2
…rning capacity, there was no need to inquire into the contribution, if any, of other causes[64]. [64] Shock Records Pty Ltd and another v Jones [2006] VSCA 180, and Jayatilake v Toyota Motor Corporation Australia Ltd [2008] VSCA 167, par 20, per Ashley JA 78 It is clear that a psychological reaction to physical in…
Grech v Orica Australia Pty Ltd & Anor
[2006] VSCA 172
Citation 3
…]: [59] Barwon Spinners, per Phillips JA for the Court at paragraphs 33 and 34; see also Chernov J A in Grech v Orica Australia Pty Ltd [2006] VSCA 172, par 2, and Ashley J A, par 9 “…one can scarcely proceed to consider the consequences to the Plaintiff of either the injury or the impairment before one has identi…
Veljanovska v Socobell OEM Pty Ltd
[2005] VSCA 227
Citation 4
…ronic pain syndrome, may be considered under sub-paragraph (c) of the definition of serious injury[65]. [65] Veljanovska v Socobell OEM Pty Ltd [2005] VSCA 227, paragraph 39, per Ashley JA 79 I am satisfied that there were degenerative changes in existence before the incident. Mr Angeleski must demonstrate the eff…
R J Gilbertsons Pty Ltd v Skorsis
[2000] VSCA 51
Citation 5
…ppeal in Angelatos v Museum of Victoria[67], and in R J Gilbetson Pty Ltd v George Skorsis [68] . Findings and conclusions: [67] [1999] 3 VR 157 [68] [2000] VSCA 51 81 There is no issue that the incident took place on 18 February 2002. I am satisfied that it did. I also accept that the incident occurred as Mr Ang…
Purkess v Crittenden
[1965] HCA 34
Citation 6
…to show what the probably future course of the pre-existing condition will be ( Watts v Rake [1960] 108 CLR 158; Purkess v Crittenden [1965] 114 CLR 164) that evidence may sometimes be held to disclose not much more than that there was a risk of later development of the condition…The accident did not cause th…
Watts v Rake
[1960] HCA 58
Citation 7
…he defendant to do the disentangling, and to show what the probably future course of the pre-existing condition will be ( Watts v Rake [1960] 108 CLR 158; Purkess v Crittenden [1965] 114 CLR 164) that evidence may sometimes be held to disclose not much more than that there was a risk of later development of th…