AMOS AIKMAN v STEPHEN MICHAEL HOWARD
[2014] ACTSC 35 (6 March 2014)
DAMAGES – personal injury – collision between motor vehicle and motorcycle – injuries to right ankle and knee requiring surgery – other injuries to the face and body leaving scarring – plaintiff PhD in geology – injuries preventing plaintiff from engaging in geological fieldwork – career as geologist foreclosed – substantial interference with physical activities resulting in loss of enjoyment of life – substantial impairment of earning capacity
Barak Pty Ltd v WTH Pty Ltd [2002] NSWSC 649
Commonwealth Development Bank of Australia Pty Ltd v Cassegrain [2002] NSWSC 980
No. SC 488 of 2009
Master Harper
Supreme Court of the ACT
Date: 6 March 2014
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE )
) No. SC 488 of 2009
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY )
BETWEEN: AMOS AIKMAN
Plaintiff
AND: STEPHEN MICHAEL HOWARD
Defendant
ORDER
Judge: Master Harper
Date: 6 March 2014
Place: Canberra
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
judgment be entered for the plaintiff in the sum of $1,232,000.00.
the plaintiff’s costs to be paid by the defendant.
the order as to costs be stayed for 21 days.
This is an action for damages for personal injury arising out of a motor vehicle collision. Liability is admitted.
The collision
The collision occurred on Wednesday 13 September 2006 at about 8:20 pm. The plaintiff was riding a Honda 110 cc motorcycle (described as a postman’s bike) in an easterly direction on Balmain Crescent, Acton, within the grounds of the Australian National University. The defendant was driving a Holden Rodeo four-wheel drive vehicle in the opposite direction. The defendant stopped in the middle of the road to make a right turn into the parking area of University House. Apparently because of lighting at about the same height in the grounds of University House, the defendant failed to see the approaching headlight of the plaintiff’s motorcycle, and commenced his right turn across the plaintiff’s path. The plaintiff braked hard and steered left but was unable to avoid a collision with the front bull bar of the defendant’s vehicle. The plaintiff’s recollection was that he was thrown over the bonnet of the vehicle to the road, and that the motorbike came in behind him and crushed his leg, which he described as scissored between the bull bar and the motorcycle.
Police and ambulance staff attended the scene. The plaintiff was taken to hospital and admitted.
The plaintiff
The plaintiff was born in December 1979. He was 26 at the date of the collision and is now 34.
He was born in England and grew up and went to school in Scotland. He studied geology at the University of Edinburgh, graduating as a bachelor of science with first class honours in 2002.
His interest in science and geology grew out of trips with his father, a schoolteacher, walking and mountaineering in the Scottish highlands. He was an avid distance runner, mountain biker and snowboarder. He regularly ran 10 km twice a week. He cycled long…
Continue reading Amos Aikman v Stephen Michael Howard
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Amos Aikman v Stephen Michael Howard [2014] ACTSC 35
- Case
- [2014] ACTSC 35
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was the extent of damages to be awarded to Aikman for his injuries, both in terms of physical impairment and economic loss. The court had to assess the impact of the injuries on Aikman's ability to work and enjoy life, as well as the overall effect on his earning capacity. The court also considered the nature of the injuries, the necessity of surgical interventions, and the long-term consequences on Aikman's professional and personal life.
The court found that Aikman's injuries were severe and had a profound impact on his life. The loss of his career as a geologist was a significant factor, as was the substantial interference with his ability to engage in physical activities and enjoy life. The court also acknowledged the impact on Aikman's earning capacity, considering both his lost income and potential future earnings. After careful consideration of all evidence and arguments presented, the court awarded Aikman $1,232,000.00 in damages. The court also ordered that Howard pay Aikman's costs, with a 21-day stay on the enforcement of that order.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.judgment be entered for the plaintiff in the sum of $1,232,000.00.
2.the plaintiff’s costs to be paid by the defendant.
3.the order as to costs be stayed for 21 days.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.