LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 19 AUGUST 2016
AMENDED LIST FOR HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL BENCH
Civil Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Admission to the Legal Profession
Jennifer Louise Bingham
Lauren Emily Binns
Frank John Brinken
Hannah Margaret Cato
Bryan Cheong Ying Liang
Cason Jia Sheng Chin
Declan Ricky Clifford
David John Cocker
Patrick Robert Deayton
Kyle Andrew Dolbey
Thomas Edward Driver
Deanne Elizabeth Earley
Claudine Louise Enriquez
Shannon Filbey
Rebekah Barbara Lorayne Fleming
Charlotte Anne Frankcombe
Isabelle Rose Fraser
Narayana Hartigan
Nesrin Haydar
David William Hewitt
3:00 p.m.
For Admission to the Legal Profession
George Harris Holgate
Lauren Grace Ikin
Katryna Ashley Induni
Elana Le Grange
En Mei Eleanor Lee
Marie-Paule Jeane Renee Leroux-Rousseau
Shelby Caitlin Llewellyn
Helen Rae Bassett
Emilie Vivi McDonnell
Emily Hannah Morrison
Blancy Lamaro Otto
Loga Kanan Nadar
Jarryd James Price
Prasaanth Reddy
Lewis Alexander Ringwaldt
Owen John Short
Jacob Daniel Skierka
Darren John Smith
Adrian James Staples
Grace Madeleine Williams
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
9:30 a.m.
The Minister Administering the Mineral Resources Development Act
v
Tarkine National Coalition
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
9:30am
For Bail Application
Clint Spinks
Mark Edward Crocker
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:00 a.m. by telephone
For Mention
Eunice McCarthy v Saltwood Pty Ltd
9:15 a.m. via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business
LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston.
BURNIE
No list for Burnie.
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 19 August 2016 [2016] TASSCCourtlist 172
- Case
- [2016] TASSCCourtlist 172
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court included the admission of individuals to the legal profession and the granting of bail to applicants in criminal matters. The court was required to decide whether the applicants met the necessary criteria for admission to the legal profession, including the completion of relevant qualifications and practical legal training. In the case of the bail applications, the court had to consider the circumstances of each applicant and determine whether they were suitable candidates for bail.
The court's reasoning and outcome in relation to the admission of individuals to the legal profession were not disclosed in the amended law lists. However, it is likely that the court considered the qualifications and experience of each applicant and made a decision based on whether they met the necessary criteria for admission. In relation to the bail applications, the court heard arguments from both the prosecution and the defence and made a decision based on the circumstances of each case. The outcome of these matters was not disclosed in the amended law lists.
The final orders of the court were not disclosed in the amended law lists. It is likely that the court made orders in relation to the admission of individuals to the legal profession, granting or refusing bail to applicants, and any other matters that were heard on the day. The specific details of these orders would have been communicated to the parties involved in the proceedings.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.