| IN THE SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA | Not Restricted | |
AT MELBOURNE
COMMERCIAL AND EQUITY DIVISION
COMMERCIAL COURT
LIST G
No. 3827 of 2010
| ALTAIN KHUDER LLC | Plaintiff |
| v | |
| IMC MINING INC and IMC MINING SOLUTIONS PTY LTD | Firstnamed Defendant Secondnamed Defendant |
---
JUDGE: | CROFT J | |
WHERE HELD: | Melbourne | |
DATE OF HEARING: | 20 August, 30 September and 4, 5 and 12 November 2010 | |
DATE OF JUDGMENT: | 28 January 2011 | |
CASE MAY BE CITED AS: | Altain Khuder LLC v IMC Mining Inc & Anor | |
MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: | [2011] VSC 1 | 1st Revision: 10 February 2011 – [7], [12], [105] and [108] |
---
ARBITRATION – Recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral award – Extent to which applicant for recognition and enforcement must establish existence of an arbitration agreement and a foreign arbitral award binding on the parties to the arbitration agreement in pursuance of which it was made – Extent of onus on a party resisting enforcement on the basis of the defences or grounds for resisting enforcement under the International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth) and the Convention on the recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral awards, New York, 1958 (“New York Convention”) – Proper procedure, and appropriateness of ex parte application, applying for recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral award under Supreme Court (Miscellaneous Civil Proceedings) Rules 2008, Order 9, and in accordance with Practice Note 2 of 2010 – Arbitration Business: International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth), ss 2D, 3(1), 8, 9 and 39; New York Convention, Articles II, IV and V.
Dardana Ltd v Yukos Oil Co (also known as Petroalliance Services Co Ltd v Yukos Oil Co) [2002] EWCA Civ 543, [2002] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 326; Aloe Vera of America Inc v Asianic Food (S) Pte Ltd and Another [2006] 3 SLR(R) 174, [2006] SGHC 78; Dallah Real Estate and Tourism Holding Company v Ministry of Religious Affairs, Government of Pakistan [2010] 1 All ER 592 (Court of Appeal) and [2010] UKSC 46 (Supreme Court).
---
APPEARANCES: | Counsel | Solicitors |
| For the Plaintiff | Mr P. Megens, solicitor | Mallesons Stephen Jaques |
| For the Firstnamed Defendant | No appearance | |
| For the Secondnamed Defendant | Mr J. Digby QC with Mr N. McAteer | Allens Arthur Robinson |
HIS HONOUR:
Introduction and procedural matters
This is an application brought by originating motion dated 14 July 2010 for enforcement of a foreign arbitral award dated 15 September 2009 at Ulaanbaatar City, Mongolia, being Case # 12/09 of the Mongolian National Arbitration Centre at the Mongolian National Chamber of Commerce and Industry (“the Award”).
The Award named the parties and the Arbitral Tribunal as follows:
“Plaintiff
Altain Khuder LLC, Mongolia
Managing Director: Batdorj G.
Address: Tenggeriin tsag Center
Olympic Street 12,
Sub-district (Khoroo) 1, Sukhbaatar District
Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
Tel: 11-324930, 11-327991, 99086630
Defendant
IMC Mining Inc., Australia
Director: Stewart Lewis
Tel: 0412 862018
Address: British Virgin Islands, of Level 40
Riverside Centre, 123 Eagle Street
Brisbane Qld, Australia
Fax: 0732269101
Tel: +61732269100, +6132269117
Email: lewiss@imcal.com.au
Arbitral Tribunal
Arbitrator selected by the Plaintiff:…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Altain Khuder LLC v IMC Mining Inc and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2011] VSC 1
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine the extent to which the applicant for recognition and enforcement of a foreign arbitral award must establish the existence of an arbitration agreement and a foreign arbitral award binding on the parties to the arbitration agreement. The court also had to consider the extent of the onus on a party resisting enforcement on the basis of the defences or grounds for resisting enforcement under the International Arbitration Act 1974 and the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, New York, 1958 (New York Convention). The court further considered the appropriate procedure and the appropriateness of an ex parte application for recognition and enforcement of a foreign arbitral award.
The court found that the plaintiff had complied with the extent of its obligations under the International Arbitration Act and the corresponding provisions of the New York Convention for the purpose of seeking enforcement of the Award against IMC Solutions. The court held that IMC Solutions had failed to establish any defence or ground for resisting enforcement of the Award against it under the provisions of the International Arbitration Act or the corresponding provisions of the New York Convention. The court also held that the procedure for enforcing the arbitral award was appropriate and that the ex parte application was justified in the circumstances. Consequently, the second defendant’s summons to set aside the orders of 20 August 2010 was dismissed. The court reserved the question of costs and will hear the parties further on this issue.
Orders
Orders of the court
I find that the plaintiff complied with the extent of its obligations under ss 8 and 9 of the IAA (and the corresponding provisions of the New York Convention) for the purpose of seeking enforcement of the Award against the second defendant, IMC Solutions, and that IMC Solutions failed to establish any defence or ground for resisting enforcement of the Award against it under the provisions of s 8 of the IAA or the corresponding provisions of the Convention.Consequently, the second defendant’s summons to set aside the orders of 20 August 2010 is dismissed.I reserve the question of costs and will hear the parties further on this issue.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.