FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Allison v Google LLC [2021] FCA 186
File number: QUD 398 of 2020 Judgment of: RANGIAH J Date of judgment: 1 March 2021 Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 10.43 – application for leave to serve originating application for preliminary discovery outside Australia – service in accordance with the Hague Service Convention – leave granted Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 7.22, 10.42 and 10.43 Cases cited: Division: General Division Registry: Queensland National Practice Area: Other Federal Jurisdiction Number of paragraphs: 10 Date of hearing: 1 March 2021 Counsel for the Prospective Applicant: Mr D Keane Solicitor for the Prospective Applicant: Delaney & Delaney Counsel for the Prospective Respondent: The Prospective Respondent did not appear ORDERS
QUD 398 of 2020 BETWEEN: SCOTT DOUGLAS ALLISON
Prospective Applicant
AND: GOOGLE LLC
Prospective Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
RANGIAH J
DATE OF ORDER:
1 MARCH 2021
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.Pursuant to r 10.43 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), the applicant has leave to serve the originating application filed 23 December 2020 upon the respondent in the United States of America, in accordance with Article 10(a) of the “Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters” concluded at The Hague on 15 November 1965, by sending it by international registered post, with an acknowledgement of receipt to be provided to the applicant, to the respondent’s address at:
Google LLC
C/O Custodian of Records
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, California, 94043
United States of America
2.The applicant is to provide a copy of the following material to the respondent by sending it to the respondent in the same manner described in order 1:
(a)the affidavit of Scott Douglas Allison filed 23 December 2020;
(b)the affidavit of Julia Frances Marler filed 23 December 2020;
(c)the affidavit of Julia Frances Marler filed 24 February 2021; and
(d)a copy of this order.
3.The originating application be listed for final hearing at 10.15 am on 23 March 2021 in Brisbane.
4.The applicant file written submissions (not exceeding 10 pages) in support of the originating application by 4.00 pm on 15 March 2021 and serve the submissions in the same manner described in order 1, or at any address for service provided by the respondent.
5.The parties have liberty to apply.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(DELIVERED EX TEMPORE AND REVISED)RANGIAH J:
The applicant has filed an originating application seeking orders under r 7.22 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) (the Rules) that the respondent, Google LLC (Google), produce documents relating to the description of persons who posted reviews of the applicant’s cosmetic medical practice on the “Google Reviews” web page under the names “Jack Stevens” and “Jason Turnball”.
The application presently before the Court is…
Continue reading Allison v Google LLC
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Allison v Google LLC [2021] FCA 186
- Case
- [2021] FCA 186
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether the plaintiff could serve the application on Google LLC in the United States in accordance with the Hague Service Convention. The court also needed to consider whether the plaintiff had provided sufficient evidence to support the application.
The court found that the plaintiff had provided sufficient evidence to support the application and that the service of the application in accordance with the Hague Service Convention was appropriate. The court granted leave for the plaintiff to serve the application on Google LLC in the United States. The court also made orders for the service of various affidavits and other documents, as well as setting a date for the final hearing of the application. The parties were also given liberty to apply for further orders if necessary.
In summary, the court granted the plaintiff's application for leave to serve the originating application for preliminary discovery outside Australia upon the defendant. The court ordered that the application be served on the defendant in accordance with the Hague Service Convention and set a date for the final hearing of the application.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Pursuant to r 10.43 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), the applicant has leave to serve the originating application filed 23 December 2020 upon the respondent in the United States of America, in accordance with Article 10(a) of the “Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters” concluded at The Hague on 15 November 1965, by sending it by international registered post, with an acknowledgement of receipt to be provided to the applicant, to the respondent’s address at:
Google LLC
C/O Custodian of Records
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, California, 94043
United States of America
2. The applicant is to provide a copy of the following material to the respondent by sending it to the respondent in the same manner described in order 1:
(a) the affidavit of Scott Douglas Allison filed 23 December 2020;
(b) the affidavit of Julia Frances Marler filed 23 December 2020;
(c) the affidavit of Julia Frances Marler filed 24 February 2021; and
(d) a copy of this order.
3. The originating application be listed for final hearing at 10.15 am on 23 March 2021 in Brisbane.
4. The applicant file written submissions (not exceeding 10 pages) in support of the originating application by 4.00 pm on 15 March 2021 and serve the submissions in the same manner described in order 1, or at any address for service provided by the respondent.
5. The parties have liberty to apply.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.