Court of Appeal
Supreme Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Alldinger v Du Ranot [2023] NSWCA 271 Hearing dates: 2 November 2023 Decision date: 10 November 2023 Before: Gleeson JA at [1]; Leeming JA at [2]; Adamson JA at [3] Decision: (1) Dismiss the appellant’s notice of motion filed on 4 October 2023.
(2) Appeal dismissed.
(3) Appellant to pay the respondent’s costs of the appeal, including the costs of the appellant’s notice of motion filed on 4 October 2023.
Catchwords: APPEALS — TORTS — DAMAGES — motor vehicle accident — successful plaintiff appealing judgment sum — application to adduce further evidence available at time of hearing in Court below — damages calculated based on actual earnings where plaintiff had not paid tax for several years — future economic loss based on past performance of business and unchallenged forensic evidence — whether future projections ought be accepted in an assessment of future economic loss
Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 56
Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW), Part 4.5, ss 94, 95, 111, 151
Motor Accidents Injuries Act 2017 (NSW)
Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 75A
Cases Cited: Akins v National Australia Bank (1994) 34 NSWLR 155
Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Kerr (2012) 83 NSWLR 302; [2012] NSWCA 13
Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298; [1959] HCA 8
Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Guo; Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Pan (1997) 191 CLR 559; [1997] HCA 22
Penrith City Council v Parks [2004] NSWCA 201
Searle v Commonwealth of Australia (2019) 100 NSWLR 55; [2019] NSWCA 127
Category: Principal judgment Parties: Michael Alldinger (Appellant)
Donovan Du Ranot (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Appellant (Self-represented)
B Kelleher SC / F Salama (Respondent)
Not applicable (Appellant)
Moray & Agnew (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2023/91369 Decision under appeal
- Court or tribunal:
- District Court
- Jurisdiction:
- Civil
- Citation:
- Date of Decision:
- 28 February 2023
- Before:
- Levy SC DCJ
- File Number(s):
- 2022/222975
HEADNOTE
[This headnote is not to be read as part of the judgment]
Michael Alldinger (the appellant) was struck by a motor vehicle driven by Donovan Du Ranot (the respondent) when riding his bicycle in June 2017. He received judgment in his favour in the sum of $1,103,234.45 ordered by Levy SC DCJ (the primary judge) in the District Court on 28 February 2023, following a three-day hearing, during which the only issue was the quantum of damages. Mr Alldinger appeals against the judgment and challenges the assessment of damages on a number of grounds.
In 2013, Mr Alldinger purchased a café business in Moss Vale and operated it as a sole trader until his accident. He admitted in this Court and the Court below that there was a discrepancy between the income which he declared on his tax returns and his actual income because he could not afford to pay tax. The café was closed from the…
- AGLC
- Alldinger v Du Ranot [2023] NSWCA 271
- Case
- [2023] NSWCA 271
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether the trial judge erred in calculating damages based on actual earnings, given the plaintiff had not paid tax for several years, and whether future economic loss, based on past business performance and unchallenged forensic evidence, ought to have been accepted. The court also considered the application to adduce further evidence.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appellant's notice of motion seeking to adduce further evidence, finding that it was not in the interests of justice to admit evidence that was available at the time of the original hearing. The court upheld the trial judge's assessment of damages, implicitly accepting the reasoning that actual earnings, even if untaxed, formed the basis for calculating past economic loss. Furthermore, the court found no error in the acceptance of future projections for economic loss, given the unchallenged forensic evidence. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
Orders
Orders of the court
(1) Dismiss the appellant’s notice of motion filed on 4 October 2023.
(2) Appeal dismissed.
(3) Appellant to pay the respondent’s costs of the appeal, including the costs of the appellant’s notice of motion filed on 4 October 2023.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.