Alldinger v Du Ranot

Case [2023] NSWCA 271


Court of Appeal


Supreme Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Alldinger v Du Ranot [2023] NSWCA 271
Hearing dates: 2 November 2023
Decision date: 10 November 2023
Before: Gleeson JA at [1]; Leeming JA at [2]; Adamson JA at [3]
Decision:

(1)   Dismiss the appellant’s notice of motion filed on 4 October 2023.

(2)   Appeal dismissed.

(3)   Appellant to pay the respondent’s costs of the appeal, including the costs of the appellant’s notice of motion filed on 4 October 2023.

Catchwords:

APPEALS — TORTS — DAMAGES — motor vehicle accident — successful plaintiff appealing judgment sum — application to adduce further evidence available at time of hearing in Court below — damages calculated based on actual earnings where plaintiff had not paid tax for several years — future economic loss based on past performance of business and unchallenged forensic evidence — whether future projections ought be accepted in an assessment of future economic loss

Legislation Cited:

Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 56

Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW), Part 4.5, ss 94, 95, 111, 151

Motor Accidents Injuries Act 2017 (NSW)

Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 75A

Cases Cited:

Akins v National Australia Bank (1994) 34 NSWLR 155

Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Kerr (2012) 83 NSWLR 302; [2012] NSWCA 13

Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298; [1959] HCA 8

Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Guo; Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Pan (1997) 191 CLR 559; [1997] HCA 22

Penrith City Council v Parks [2004] NSWCA 201

R v Birks (1990) 19 NSWLR 677

Searle v Commonwealth of Australia (2019) 100 NSWLR 55; [2019] NSWCA 127

Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Michael Alldinger (Appellant)
Donovan Du Ranot (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
Appellant (Self-represented)
B Kelleher SC / F Salama (Respondent)

Solicitors:
Not applicable (Appellant)
Moray & Agnew (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2023/91369
 Decision under appeal 
Court or tribunal:
District Court
Jurisdiction:
Civil
Citation:

Alldinger v Du Ranot [2023] NSWDC 37

Date of Decision:
28 February 2023
Before:
Levy SC DCJ
File Number(s):
2022/222975

HEADNOTE

[This headnote is not to be read as part of the judgment]

Michael Alldinger (the appellant) was struck by a motor vehicle driven by Donovan Du Ranot (the respondent) when riding his bicycle in June 2017. He received judgment in his favour in the sum of $1,103,234.45 ordered by Levy SC DCJ (the primary judge) in the District Court on 28 February 2023, following a three-day hearing, during which the only issue was the quantum of damages. Mr Alldinger appeals against the judgment and challenges the assessment of damages on a number of grounds.

In 2013, Mr Alldinger purchased a café business in Moss Vale and operated it as a sole trader until his accident. He admitted in this Court and the Court below that there was a discrepancy between the income which he declared on his tax returns and his actual income because he could not afford to pay tax. The café was closed from the…

Details
AGLC
Alldinger v Du Ranot [2023] NSWCA 271
Case
[2023] NSWCA 271
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The appeal concerned a motor vehicle accident where the plaintiff, Alldinger, was successful in the primary proceedings but appealed the quantum of damages awarded. The appeal was heard by Gleeson, Leeming, and Adamson JJA. Alldinger sought to adduce further evidence that was available at the time of the original hearing.

The central legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether the trial judge erred in calculating damages based on actual earnings, given the plaintiff had not paid tax for several years, and whether future economic loss, based on past business performance and unchallenged forensic evidence, ought to have been accepted. The court also considered the application to adduce further evidence.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appellant's notice of motion seeking to adduce further evidence, finding that it was not in the interests of justice to admit evidence that was available at the time of the original hearing. The court upheld the trial judge's assessment of damages, implicitly accepting the reasoning that actual earnings, even if untaxed, formed the basis for calculating past economic loss. Furthermore, the court found no error in the acceptance of future projections for economic loss, given the unchallenged forensic evidence. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) Dismiss the appellant’s notice of motion filed on 4 October 2023.

(2) Appeal dismissed.

(3) Appellant to pay the respondent’s costs of the appeal, including the costs of the appellant’s notice of motion filed on 4 October 2023.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.