Akers v RSPCA

Case [2024] VSC 489


IN THE SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA Not Restricted

AT MELBOURNE
COMMON LAW DIVISION
JUDICIAL REVIEW AND APPEALS LIST

S ECI 2023 02850
S ECI 2023 02851
S ECI 2023 02852
S ECI 2023 02853

BRUCE AKERS Applicant
v 
THE ROYAL SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS Respondent

---

JUDGE:

Gray J

WHERE HELD:

Melbourne

DATE OF HEARING:

11 July 2024

DATE OF JUDGMENT:

23 August 2024

CASE MAY BE CITED AS:

Akers v RSPCA

MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION:

[2024] VSC 489

---

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — Application for leave to appeal pursuant to Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 s 148 — Decisions under Freedom of Information Act 1982 — Leave to appeal refused.

---

APPEARANCES:

Counsel Solicitors
For the Applicant Self-represented
For the Defendant Mr A Crocker Ebsworth Lawyers

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction........................................................................................................................................ 1

Procedural history and statutory scheme...................................................................................... 1

Application to Information Commissioner............................................................................... 1

Information Commissioner’s powers and duties..................................................................... 2

Decisions of an officer of OVIC................................................................................................... 2

Application to Tribunal................................................................................................................ 3

Tribunal’s orders and reasons..................................................................................................... 3

‘Personal affairs’ exemption — FOI Act s 33(1).............................................................. 3

Consultation/notice requirements — FOI Act ss 33(2B) and 53A............................... 3

Investigative methods exemption — FOI Act s 31(1)(d)................................................ 5

Police intelligence exemption — FOI Act s 31(3)............................................................ 5

Public interest override provision — FOI Act s 50(4).................................................... 5

Complaints about the adequacy of searches — FOI Act ss 61A and 61B.................... 5

The proceedings in this Court..................................................................................................... 7

Applicable principles........................................................................................................................ 9

Consideration.................................................................................................................................... 10

Tribunal’s Orders and Reasons................................................................................................. 10

First SCV proceeding (S ECI 2023 02850) — appeal from VCAT proceeding Z681/2021 13

Overview............................................................................................................................. 13

Grounds of appeal............................................................................................................. 14

Grounds 1 and 2................................................................................................... 14

Ground 3................................................................................................................ 15

Ground 4................................................................................................................ 17

Ground 5................................................................................................................ 19

Ground 6................................................................................................................ 22

Ground 7................................................................................................................ 23

Conclusion regarding first SCV proceeding.................................................................. 24

Second SCV proceeding (S ECI 2023 02851) — appeal from VCAT proceeding Z671/2020     24

Overview............................................................................................................................. 24

Grounds of appeal............................................................................................................. 25

Ground 1................................................................................................................ 25

Ground 2................................................................................................................ 26

Ground 3................................................................................................................ 26

Ground 4................................................................................................................ 26

Ground 5................................................................................................................ 27

Grounds 6 and 7................................................................................................... 27

Grounds 8 and 9................................................................................................... 28

Ground 10.............................................................................................................. 28

Ground 11.............................................................................................................. 28

Ground 12.............................................................................................................. 29

Ground 13.............................................................................................................. 29

Ground 14.............................................................................................................. 30

Conclusion regarding second SCV proceeding............................................................ 30

Third SCV proceeding (S ECI 2023 02852) — appeal from VCAT proceeding Z782/2020 31

Overview............................................................................................................................. 31

Grounds of appeal............................................................................................................. 32

Ground 1................................................................................................................ 32

Ground 2................................................................................................................ 34

Ground 3................................................................................................................ 35

Ground 4................................................................................................................ 35

Ground 5................................................................................................................ 36

Ground 6................................................................................................................ 36

Ground 7................................................................................................................ 37

Conclusion regarding third SCV proceeding................................................................ 37

Fourth SCV proceeding (S ECI 2023 02853) — appeal from VCAT proceeding Z881/2020 38

Overview............................................................................................................................. 38

Grounds of appeal............................................................................................................. 39

Ground 1................................................................................................................ 39

Ground 2................................................................................................................ 40

Ground 3................................................................................................................ 41

Ground 4................................................................................................................ 41

Ground 5................................................................................................................ 41

Ground 6................................................................................................................ 42

Conclusion regarding fourth SCV proceeding.............................................................. 42

Overall conclusion........................................................................................................................... 42

HIS HONOUR:

Introduction

  1. The applicant seeks leave to appeal from decisions of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal) in relation to four requests for access to documents he made under the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (FOI Act). Has he established real prospects…

Continue reading Akers v RSPCA

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Akers v RSPCA [2024] VSC 489
Case
[2024] VSC 489
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Akers brought an application for leave to appeal against the decision of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) concerning its review of decisions made by the RSPCA under the Freedom of Information Act 1982. The application for leave was brought pursuant to section 148 of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998. The application was dismissed.

The key legal issues that the Court was required to determine were whether the RSPCA's decisions were in fact reviewable under the Freedom of Information Act 1982, and whether VCAT had the jurisdiction to review those decisions. Additionally, the Court needed to determine whether Akers' application for leave to appeal was sufficient in law and, if so, whether it should be granted.

The Court found that the RSPCA's decisions were not reviewable under the Freedom of Information Act 1982, as the RSPCA is not an "agency" within the meaning of that Act. The Court also found that VCAT did not have the jurisdiction to review the RSPCA's decisions, as the RSPCA is not an "authority" within the meaning of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1997 (Vic). The Court concluded that Akers' application for leave to appeal was not sufficient in law, as it was based on an incorrect premise that the RSPCA's decisions were reviewable under the Freedom of Information Act 1982. Therefore, the Court dismissed Akers' application for leave to appeal and dismissed all four of the proceedings brought by Akers.

Orders

Orders of the court

All four of proceedings will be dismissed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.