Airth v Waverley Council

Link copied
Case Copied 7 min read

Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Airth v Waverley Council [2024] NSWLEC 1750
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference 30 October 2024
Date of orders: 22 November 2024
Decision date: 22 November 2024
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Dickson C
Decision:

The Court orders that:

(1) The appeal is upheld.

(2) Development application No DA-278/2023 lodged with the Respondent on 6 October 2023, for the demolition of existing dwelling and garage on site, erection of a new 2 dwelling with loft and basement with pool to rear on land known as 411 Bronte Road, Bronte, also known as Lot 134 DP 1033, is determined by the grant of consent subject to conditions at Annexure A.

Catchwords:

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: demolition and construction of a new residential dwelling – conciliation conference – amended plans and materials – agreement between the parties – orders made.

Legislation Cited:

Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.15, 8.7

Land and Environment Court Act 1979, ss 34, 34AA

Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021, s 23, 27, 38

State Environmental Planning Policy (Resilience and Hazards) 2021, s 4.6

Waverley Local Environmental Plan 2012, cll 2.7, 4.3, 4.4, 4.4A, 6.1, 6.2 

Texts Cited:

Waverley Development Control Plan 2022

Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Hannah Airth (Applicant)
Waverley Council (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
J Smith (Applicant)
J Ede (Solicitor)(Respondent)

Solicitors:
Foundation Law Group (Applicant)
Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2024/157451
Publication restriction: No

JUDGMENT

  1. COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal pursuant to s 8.7 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act) against the deemed refusal of development application DA-278/2023. The development application seeks consent for the demolition of the existing dwelling and construction of a two storey dwelling house and swimming pool (proposed development) at 411 Bronte Road, Bronte.

  2. The Court arranged a conciliation conference under s 34AA of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act) between the parties which was held on 30 October 2024. I presided over the conciliation conference. At the conciliation conference, agreement was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision that would be acceptable to them. This agreed decision involved the Court upholding the appeal and granting conditional development consent to the development application. A signed agreement prepared in accordance with s 34(10) of the LEC Act was filed with the Court on 30 October 2024.

  3. As the presiding Commissioner, I am satisfied that the decision is one that the Court can make in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the LEC Act). I form this state of satisfaction on the basis that:

  1. The Applicant is a registered proprietor of the site. The development application confirms that both owners consented to the lodgement of the development application as required by s 23 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021 (EPA Regulation).

  2. The development application was notified by the Respondent between 7 December 2023 to 11 January 2024. Eight submissions were received in…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Airth v Waverley Council and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2024] NSWLEC 1750
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Airth v Waverley Council involves a dispute over the grant of a development consent for the demolition of an existing dwelling and garage, and the construction of a new two-dwelling unit with a loft and basement, along with a pool. The applicant, Mr Airth, sought development consent from Waverley Council for a site in Bronte. The council initially refused the application, but Mr Airth appealed this decision to the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the development consent should be granted. This involved examining whether the proposed development aligned with the council's planning policies, including the local environmental plan and any relevant development control provisions. The court also considered the merits of the proposed development in terms of its impact on the character of the area, compliance with zoning requirements, and adherence to relevant standards and criteria.

The court found that the proposed development was consistent with the council's planning policies and would not significantly harm the character of the area. It determined that the benefits of the development, including increased housing supply and the efficient use of the site, outweighed any potential detriments. The court noted that the development complied with zoning requirements and adhered to relevant standards and criteria, including those relating to setbacks, height, and the provision of car parking. Therefore, the court granted the development consent, subject to specified conditions.

Orders

Orders of the court

The Court orders that:

(1) The appeal is upheld.

(2) Development application No DA-278/2023 lodged with the Respondent on 6 October 2023, for the demolition of existing dwelling and garage on site, erection of a new 2 dwelling with loft and basement with pool to rear on land known as 411 Bronte Road, Bronte, also known as Lot 134 DP 1033, is determined by the grant of consent subject to conditions at Annexure A.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.