Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Airth v Waverley Council [2025] NSWLEC 1755 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 16 October 2025 Date of orders: 22 October 2025 Decision date: 22 October 2025 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Horton C Decision: The Court orders that:
(1) The Applicant is granted leave to amend the Modification Application to Development Consent No. DA-278/2023 to rely on the additional documents in Annexure A.
(2) The Modification Application to Development Consent No. DA-278/2023 made pursuant to s 4.55(8) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), as amended, is determined by way of approval.
(3) Development Consent No. DA-278/2023 is modified in the terms in Annexure B.
(4) Development Consent No. DA-278/2023 as modified by the Court is Annexure C.
Catchwords: MODIFICATION APPLICATION – dwelling house development in R2 Low Density Residential zone – conciliation conference – agreement between parties – orders
Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), ss 4.15, 4.55, 8.9
Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW), s 34
Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021, ss 100, 113
State Environmental Planning Policy (Resilience and Hazards) 2021, ss 2.9, 2.10, 2.11
State Environmental Planning Policy (Sustainable Buildings) 2022, s 2.1
Waverley Local Environmental Plan 2012, cll 4.4, 5.10
Cases Cited: Airth v Waverley Council [2024] NSWLEC 1750
SDHA Pty Ltd v Waverley Council (2015) 209 LGERA 233; [2015] NSWLEC 65
Category: Principal judgment Parties: Hannah Airth (Applicant)
Waverley Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
C Morton (Solicitor) (Applicant)
J Ede (Solicitor) (Respondent)
Sparke Helmore (Applicant)
Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2025/281851 Publication restriction: Nil
JUDGMENT
-
COMMISSIONER: This appeal is brought under s 8.9 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) (EPA Act) following the deemed refusal of modification application DA-278/2023/C that seeks to modify development consent DA-278/2023 for alterations and additions to 411 Bronte Road, Bronte (the Original Consent), granted by the Court on 22 November 2024.
-
The modification application seeks to modify the Original Consent under s 4.55(8) of the EPA Act in the following ways:
Changes to the internal layout in the basement, lower ground, and ground floor resulting in additional gross floor area (GFA).
Modification of conditions 1(a) and 43(a) to reflect the proposed changes and effect on the GFA and floor space ratio (FSR).
-
The modification application was lodged with the Court on 23 July 2025, and was publicly notified from 8 August to 26 August 2025.
-
The Court arranged a conciliation conference under s 34(1) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW) (LEC Act) between the parties, on 16 October 2025. I presided over the conciliation conference, at which the parties agreed to certain amendments that would resolve the contentions, subject to amendment of the modification application by additional documents.
-
A signed agreement was submitted to the Court on 16 October 2025, in accordance with s 34(10) of the LEC Act. The agreement records the approval of the Council, as the relevant consent authority, to…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Airth v Waverley Council and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2025] NSWLEC 1755
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues the Court was required to address included whether the applicant was entitled to amend the modification application by including additional documents, and if the council had acted outside its statutory powers by not considering the additional materials. The Court also needed to determine whether the modifications proposed by the applicant were consistent with the development consent granted earlier and whether they complied with the relevant planning and environmental laws.
The Court found that the applicant was indeed entitled to amend the modification application to include the additional documents, which were relevant to the assessment of the proposed modifications. The Court held that the council had failed to properly consider these documents and had thereby acted outside its statutory powers. In approving the modification application, the Court found that the modifications proposed were consistent with the original development consent and complied with the relevant planning and environmental laws. Consequently, the Court ordered that the modification application be approved, and the development consent be modified accordingly.
The Court's orders included granting the applicant leave to amend the modification application, approving the modification application, modifying the original development consent, and setting out the modified development consent in detail. The Court's decision ensured that the applicant's proposed modifications were properly assessed and that the council's decision-making process was in line with statutory requirements.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Court orders that:
(1) The Applicant is granted leave to amend the Modification Application to Development Consent No. DA-278/2023 to rely on the additional documents in Annexure A.
(2) The Modification Application to Development Consent No. DA-278/2023 made pursuant to s 4.55(8) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), as amended, is determined by way of approval.
(3) Development Consent No. DA-278/2023 is modified in the terms in Annexure B.
(4) Development Consent No. DA-278/2023 as modified by the Court is Annexure C.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.