Ahmed v Ahmed

Case [2023] NSWCA 45


Court of Appeal


Supreme Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Ahmed v Ahmed [2023] NSWCA 45
Hearing dates: 16 March 2023
Date of orders: 22 March 2023
Decision date: 22 March 2023
Before: Ward P at [1]; Adamson JA at [32]
Decision:

1.   Extension of time for the filing of the summons for leave to appeal is granted.

2.   Summons for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.

Catchwords:

APPEALS – Leave to appeal – Evidence on application for leave – Where first instance proceedings to prevent lapse of caveat raised allegations of fraud – Where proceedings summarily dismissed at first instance

Legislation Cited:

Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 61(3)

Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 101(2)(l)

Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW)

Cases Cited:

AB v State of New South Wales [2014] NSWCA 243

Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd v Philip Morris Inc (1981) 148 CLR 170; [1981] HCA 39

Ahmed v Ahmed [2022] NSWSC 1003

Be Financial Pty Ltd as Trustee for Be Financial Operations Trust v Das [2012] NSWCA 164

Darrell Lea (Vic) Pty Ltd v Union Assurance Society of Australia Ltd [1969] VR 401

Donaldson v State of New South Wales [2020] NSWCA 329

House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499

Johnson Tiles Pty Ltd v Esso Australia Ltd [2000] FCA 1572; (2000) 104 FCR 564

Minogue v Williams [2000] FCA 125; (2000) 60 ALD 366

BHP Petroleum Pty Ltd v Oil Basins Ltd [1985] VR 756

Niemann v Electronic Industries Ltd [1978] VR 431

Secretary, Dept of Family and Community Services v Smith (2017) 95 NSWLR 597; [2017] NSWCA 206

TFM Epping Land Pty Ltd v Decon Australia Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCA 93

Turan Ahmed v Ziynet Ahmed [2022] NSWSC 921

Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Turan Ahmed (Applicant)
Ziynet Ahmed (Respondent)
Representation: Counsel:
T Ahmed (self-represented)
File Number(s): 2022/00241730
Publication restriction: Nil
 Decision under appeal 
Court or tribunal:
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Jurisdiction:
Equity Division
Citation:

[2022] NSWSC 1003

Date of Decision:
26 July 2022
Before:
Hammerschlag CJ in Eq
File Number(s):
2021/360890

JUDGMENT

  1. WARD P: By summons dated 29 September 2022, the applicant, Mr Turan Ahmed, seeks leave to appeal from orders made on 26 July 2022 by Hammerschlag CJ in Eq, summarily dismissing proceedings commenced by the applicant against his estranged sister, Ms Ziynet Ahmed (the respondent to the present application) (see Ahmed v Ahmed [2022] NSWSC 1003, the primary judgment). In those proceedings, the applicant was seeking an interim injunction to prevent the lapse of a caveat that had been lodged in his name over a property in Woy Woy, New South Wales, registered in the name of the respondent.

  2. The caveat in question, purporting to be lodged by the applicant (though the applicant contends that it was falsely lodged on the title to the property as part of an overarching fraud and conspiracy perpetrated on him by his sister, in collusion with various others including their late mother), claimed…

Continue reading Ahmed v Ahmed

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Ahmed v Ahmed [2023] NSWCA 45
Case
[2023] NSWCA 45
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This matter concerned an application for leave to appeal from a decision of the Supreme Court of New South Wales, heard by Ward P and Adamson JA. The original proceedings involved allegations of fraud, brought in an effort to prevent the lapse of a caveat. These proceedings were summarily dismissed at first instance.

The primary legal issue before the appellate court was whether to grant leave to appeal from the summary dismissal of the fraud allegations. This required the court to consider the evidence presented on the application for leave to appeal, in the context of the first instance proceedings that had been brought to prevent the lapse of a caveat and which had been summarily dismissed.

The Court granted an extension of time for the filing of the summons for leave to appeal. However, after considering the material before it, the Court dismissed the summons for leave to appeal, ordering that the applicant pay the respondent's costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. Extension of time for the filing of the summons for leave to appeal is granted.

2. Summons for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.