AFT v B

Case [2004] QSC 403


SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION:

AFT v B [2004] QSC 403

PARTIES:

AFT
(applicant)
v
LB AND THE ESTATE OF NB (Deceased)
(respondent)

FILE NO:

BS8198 of 2004

DIVISION:

Trial

PROCEEDING:

Application

DELIVERED ON:

8 November 2004

DELIVERED AT:

Brisbane

HEARING DATE:

4 October 2004

JUDGE:

Wilson J

ORDER:

(1)      That the first respondent LB pay to the applicant AFT the sum of $20,000 by way of compensation for injury suffered by her by reason of the offence of rape of which the first respondent was convicted on 12 July 1985;

(2)      That the second respondent The Estate of NB (deceased) pay to the applicant AFT the sum of $15,000 by way of compensation for injury suffered by her by reason of the offence of rape of which NB was convicted on 12 July 1985;

(3)      That the respondents pay the applicant’s costs of and incidental to the application to be assessed on the standard basis.

CATCHWORDS:

CRIMINAL LAW – GENERAL MATTERS – JUDGMENT AND PUNISHMENT – ORDERS FOR COMPENSATION, REPARATION, RESTITUTION, FORFEITURE AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING TO DISPOSAL OF PROPERTY – COMPENSATION – QUEENSLAND – where the applicant was raped by the second respondent (her stepfather) – where the rape was facilitated by the first respondent (the applicant’s mother) – where the second respondent is deceased – where the rape occurred 19 years before the application for compensation – where the applicant suffers posttraumatic stress disorder as a consequence of the rape

Criminal Code1899 (Qld), ch 65A, ss663AA(1), 663B(1)
Criminal Offence Victims Act 1995 (Qld), s 46(2)
Limitation of Actions Act 1974 (Qld), s 10(1)(d)
Public Trustee Act 1935 (Qld), s 35
Supreme Court of Queensland Act 1991 (Qld), s 93N
Succession Act 1981 (Qld), s 66(1)
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999, r 71

Griffiths v Kerkemeyer (1977) 139 CLR 161, considered
Jacob v Roberts [2002] QCA 87, followed
R v Chong, ex parte Chong [2001] 2 QdR 301, followed
R v Grahame, ex parte Freeman, followed
R v Jones, ex parte McClintock [1996] 1 QdR 524, followed
R v Morrison, ex parte West [1998] 2 QdR 79, followed
Stewart v Woods [2002] QSC 164, followed

COUNSEL:

AJ Kimmins for the applicant

SOLICITORS:

Tony Bailey Solicitor for the applicant

  1. WILSON J:  On 19 January 1985 the applicant was living in Normanton with her mother (LB) and stepfather (NB). That night she was raped by her stepfather; her mother not only stood by but actively encouraged NB to commit the rape and forced the applicant to submit to the ordeal. On 12 July 1985 LB and NB were both convicted of rape; she was sentenced to 7 years’ imprisonment with hard labour, and he was sentenced to 5 years’ imprisonment with a recommendation for parole after 2 years. NB has since died.

  1. The applicant seeks criminal compensation from her mother (the first respondent) and the estate of her stepfather (the second respondent).

  1. The applicable criminal compensation scheme is that in chapter 65A of the

Continue reading AFT v B

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
AFT v B [2004] QSC 403
Case
[2004] QSC 403
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Federal Court was asked to decide an application for compensation in the case of AFT v B. AFT, the applicant, had been raped by NB, her stepfather, 19 years prior to the application. The applicant’s mother, LB, was the first respondent and was convicted in connection with the rape. The second respondent was the estate of NB, who had died before the application was made. AFT was seeking compensation for the injury she suffered as a result of the rape, including ongoing posttraumatic stress disorder. The legal issues the court was required to determine were whether AFT was entitled to compensation under the relevant legislation, and if so, how much compensation should be awarded.

The court began by reviewing the applicable legislation and relevant case law to establish the principles governing compensation for victims of sexual offences. It was established that AFT was entitled to compensation under the relevant provisions. The court then considered the appropriate amount of compensation, taking into account the severity of the injury, the delay in making the application, and the respondents’ ability to pay. The court awarded AFT $20,000 from LB and $15,000 from NB’s estate. The court also ordered the respondents to pay AFT’s costs of and incidental to the application.

In conclusion, the court found in favour of the applicant and ordered the respondents to pay compensation and costs. The court recognised the profound impact of the rape on AFT and acknowledged the delay in making the application. The court determined the appropriate amount of compensation, considering the relevant factors. The court’s decision provides a clear framework for future applications for compensation in similar circumstances.

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) That the first respondent LB pay to the applicant AFT the sum of $20,000 by way of compensation for injury suffered by her by reason of the offence of rape of which the first respondent was convicted on 12 July 1985;

(2) That the second respondent The Estate of NB (deceased) pay to the applicant AFT the sum of $15,000 by way of compensation for injury suffered by her by reason of the offence of rape of which NB was convicted on 12 July 1985;

(3) That the respondents pay the applicant’s costs of and incidental to the application to be assessed on the standard basis.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.