Sutton v Laminex Group Pty Ltd
[2011] VSCA 52
Citation 1
(Para 89)
…ber of those cases, there was evidence of significant or constant pain.[10] [9] See also Sutton v Laminex Group Pty Ltd [2011] VSCA 52 at [89] citing Stijepic v One Force [10] Graham v Qantas Airways [2009] VCC 0537 at [49]; Sasalu v Coburg Services Pty Ltd [2009] 69 In the present case there is little, if any, p…
Stijepic v One Force Group Aust Pty Ltd
[2009] VSCA 181
Citation 2
…4]): “…the significance of what has been lost, which bears upon the seriousness of consequences, may be informed, to an [3] [2009] VSCA 181 4 [2008]VSCA 260 extent, by what is retained…”…
Sumbul v Melbourne All Toya Wreckers Pty Ltd
[2006] VSCA 292
Citation 3
…the injury, it would ordinarily be difficult to conclude that the pain and suffering consequences of it are ‘at least very considerable…” [5] [2006] VSCA 292…
Grech v Orica Australia Pty Ltd & Anor
[2006] VSCA 172
Citation 4
…ries as discussed in the Court of Appeal decision of Grech v Orica Australia Pty Ltd & Anor .[7] Evidence Plaintiff’s Evidence Written evidence [7] [2006] VSCA 172 at paras 58, 64 and 65 per Ashley JA. 19 The plaintiff filed and served four affidavits[8] and was cross examined. [8] Affidavits of 8.4.08; 19.8.09; 2…
Barwon Spinners Pty Ltd & Ors v Podolak
[2005] VSCA 33
Citation 5
…ificant or marked, and as being at least very considerable.[2] [2] See s.134AB(38)(c) of the Act; Barwon Spinners Pty Ltd v Podolak [2005] VSCA 33. 15 In determining whether the consequences are “serious” within the meaning of s.134AB of the Act in circumstances where a plaintiff has returned to work, I am also a…