ABJ19 as Representative of ABI19 v Minister for Home Affairs

The applicant, ABJ19, acting as the litigation guardian for ABI19, sought judicial review of a decision by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) concerning an application for a Protection (subclass 866) visa. The Minister for Home Affairs was the first respondent. The core of the dispute revolved around whether the AAT had adequately considered all the evidence presented and taken into account all relevant considerations when making its decision.

The central legal issues before the court were whether the AAT had committed jurisdictional error by failing to consider all the evidence and relevant considerations, and whether the Tribunal had complied with the requirements of sections 424A and 424AA of the *Migration Act 1958* (Cth). These sections impose obligations on the Tribunal regarding the provision of information to applicants and the consideration of that information.

The court found that no jurisdictional error had been made out. The reasoning, though not detailed in the provided text, indicates that the court was satisfied that the AAT had properly discharged its obligations under the *Migration Act* and had considered the evidence and relevant factors appropriately. Consequently, the application for judicial review was dismissed. The litigation guardian was ordered to pay the first respondent's costs fixed at $7,467.00.