LAND COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION:Aberdour Investments v Redland Shire Council [2003] QLC 0082
PARTIES:Aberdour Investments Pty Ltd (claimant)
v.
Redland Shire Council (respondent)
FILE NO: A2002/0055
DIVISION: Land Court of Queensland
PROCEEDING: Claim for compensation payable consequent upon the
resumption by the Redland Shire Council, of an area of 708 m², being Lot 47 on RP 130551, Parish of Capalaba, County of Stanley, for the development of community facilities and other civic improvements under the provisions of the Acquisition of Land Act 1967
DELIVERED ON: 18 November 2003
DELIVERED AT: Brisbane
HEARD AT: Brisbane
MEMBER Mr JJ Trickett, President
ORDER BY AGREEMENT: 1. Compensation is determined at One Hundred
and Eighty-seven Thousand Dollars ($187,000), comprising loss of land, severance and injurious affection One Hundred and Seventy-seven Thousand Dollars ($177,000) and disturbance Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000).
2.The respondent pay interest at the rate of 6.75%:
· on the amount of $177,000 from the date of resumption, 13 May 1994, up to 15 December 1994, when the advance of
$156,000 and also the disturbance of
$10,000 was paid;
· and then on the amount of $31,000 from 16 December 1994 up to the day immediately preceding the date upon which compensation is made.
APPEARANCES: Mr PJ Lyons QC, with him Mr A Hyam for the claimant
Mr RM Needham for the respondent
SOLICITORS: Hemming & Hart for the claimant King & Co for the respondent
JJ TRICKETT PRESIDENT OF THE LAND COURT
2
- AGLC
- Aberdour Investments v Redland Shire Council [2003] QLC 82
- Case
- [2003] QLC 82
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was to determine the appropriate amount of compensation payable to Aberdour Investments for the resumed land. This involved assessing the value of the land, considering factors such as its location, size, and potential use, as well as the impact of the resumption on adjacent properties and the overall development project. The court was also required to consider the applicable statutory provisions and relevant case law to ensure a fair and equitable determination of compensation.
In delivering his judgment, President Trickett meticulously evaluated the evidence and submissions presented by both parties. He considered expert valuations, the impact of the resumption on the claimant's property, and the necessity of the development project for the public benefit. President Trickett concluded that the compensation payable was One Hundred and Eighty-seven Thousand Dollars, comprising One Hundred and Seventy-seven Thousand Dollars for loss of land, severance, and injurious affection, and Ten Thousand Dollars for disturbance. Furthermore, the court ordered the respondent to pay interest on the compensation amount from the date of resumption up until the date of payment.
The final orders of the court mandated that the Redland Shire Council pay Aberdour Investments compensation of One Hundred and Eighty-seven Thousand Dollars, along with interest at the rate of 6.75% on specific amounts from the date of resumption up until the date of payment. This decision provided clarity and finality to the dispute, ensuring that Aberdour Investments received appropriate compensation for the resumed land.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.