Appeal Panel - Internal
CITATION: Abdul-Karim v New South Wales Bar Association (LSD) [2004] NSWADTAP 5 PARTIES: APPELLANT
Michael Saadey Abdul-Karim
RESPONDENT
The Council of the New South Wales Bar AssociationFILE NUMBER: 039051 HEARING DATES: 26/11/2003 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 11/26/2003 DATE OF DECISION:
02/17/2004DECISION UNDER APPEAL:
New South Wales Bar Association v Abdul-Karim [2003] NSWADT 60, New South Wales Bar Association v Abdul-Karim (No 2) [2003] NSWADT 144BEFORE: Nader J QC - ADCJ (Deputy President); Macfarlan R QC - Judicial Member; Bubniuk L - Member CATCHWORDS: leave to withdraw appeal MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter FILE NUMBER UNDER APPEAL: 012029 DATE OF DECISION UNDER APPEAL: 06/17/2003 LEGISLATION CITED: CASES CITED: REPRESENTATION: APPELLANT
R Wilson, barrister
RESPONDENT
P Mahony, barristerORDERS: 1. That the Appellant be granted leave to withdraw his Notice of Appeal.; 2. The Appellant pay the Respondent’s costs of the appeal.
1 By his Notice of Appeal dated 10 July 2003 and filed on 11 July 2003, the Appellant sought the setting aside of findings of the Tribunal contained in its decision of 27 March 2003 and, on the question of penalty, of 17 June 2003.
2 On 26 November 2003, the Appellant sought leave to withdraw his appeal. This was opposed by the Respondent upon the basis that the withdrawal would deprive the Respondent of the opportunity to seek the substituted orders set out in its Reply filed on 15 August 2003.
3 By adopting the course of seeking substituted orders in its Reply, the Respondent assumed the risk that the opportunity to seek those substituted orders might be lost if the appeal were not pursued. It was open to the Respondent to take the alternative course of lodging an appeal itself.
4 In the circumstances, we do not see any reason why leave should not be given to the Appellant to withdraw his appeal, on the basis that he pay the costs thus far incurred by the Respondent in respect of the appeal.
- AGLC
- Abdul-Karim v New South Wales Bar Association (LSD) [2004] NSWADTAP 5
- Case
- [2004] NSWADTAP 5
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the grounds upon which the appellant sought leave to withdraw his appeal, considering whether the appeal had become an abuse of process or whether there were other compelling reasons to permit the withdrawal. The court considered the appellant's conduct throughout the proceedings, the merits of the case, and the potential impact on the respondent if the withdrawal were to be granted. The court also took into account the public interest in the administration of justice and the efficiency of court processes.
After careful consideration, the court determined that the appellant should be granted leave to withdraw his notice of appeal. The court found that the appellant's application was not an abuse of process and that there were sufficient grounds to permit the withdrawal. The court also ordered that the appellant pay the respondent's costs of the appeal, recognising the respondent's efforts and resources expended in responding to the appeal. This decision reflects the court's balanced approach to the administration of justice, ensuring that both parties' interests are appropriately considered.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. That the Appellant be granted leave to withdraw his Notice of Appeal.; 2. The Appellant pay the Respondent’s costs of the appeal.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.