AB v Keanes

Case [2019] NSWDC 693


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: AB v Keanes [2019] NSWDC 693
Hearing dates: 29-30 October 2019
Date of orders: 20 November 2019
Decision date: 20 November 2019
Jurisdiction:Civil
Before: Dicker SC DCJ
Decision:

(1) Judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $77,768.31.
(2) The defendant is to pay the plaintiff’s costs of the proceedings as agreed or assessed.
(3) Liberty to the parties to apply within 14 days to vary the order in (2) above or to correct any mathematical errors in my calculations.
(4) Exhibits to be returned in 28 days.
(5) Pursuant to section 77 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), the amount referred to in order (1) is to be paid to the NSW Trustee and Guardian for investment on behalf of the plaintiff until she attains the age of 18 years.

Catchwords: Torts – negligence – motor vehicle accident – liability not in issue – extent of injuries to child pillion passenger on a motorcycle – extent of residual disabilities and injuries in issue – whether plaintiff has established a need for past or future commercial or domestic assistance – whether a loss of future earning capacity established
Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW)
Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW)
Cases Cited: Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Kerr [2012] NSWCA 13
Cairncross v Hewagama [2018] NSWDC 166
Fegin bht Rozenauers v Lane Cove House Pty Ltd [2007] NSWCA 88
Graham v Baker (1961) 106 CLR 340
New South Wales v Moss (2000) 54 NSWLR 536
Russell v Rail Infrastructure Corporation [2007] NSWSC 447
Sretenovic v Reed [2009] NSWCA 280
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: AB by her Tutor BB (Plaintiff)
Lynette Keanes (Defendant)
Representation:

Counsel:
A Canceri (Plaintiff)
D Hanna (Defendant)

  Solicitors:
CMC Lawyers (Plaintiff)
Moray & Agnew (Defendant)
File Number(s): 2018/00374331

Judgment

  1. In these proceedings, the plaintiff, AB, seeks by her tutor mother damages under the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW) (“the Act”) for personal injuries suffered by her in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on 1 April 2016 in Penrith in Sydney.

  2. The plaintiff, who was then 12 years of age, was travelling as a pillion passenger on a motorcycle being driven by her father. She was wearing a motorcycle helmet at the time. The motorcycle was travelling along Parker Street at the intersection of Glebe Place in Penrith when the defendant’s motor vehicle drove from Glebe Place into the intersection and collided with the motorcycle.

  3. Liability for the accident is not in issue. There is also no question of contributory negligence.

  4. The case in summary therefore, is one for the assessment of damages to which the plaintiff is entitled. The plaintiff has not reached the impairment threshold of greater than 10% which permits the award of damages to her for non-economic loss under s 131 of the Act.

  5. The plaintiff claims damages for:

  1. Past and future out-of-pocket expenses;

  2. Future loss of earning capacity on a buffer basis;

  3. A loss of superannuation benefits which should be…

Continue reading AB v Keanes

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
AB v Keanes [2019] NSWDC 693
Case
[2019] NSWDC 693
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of AB v Keanes, heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales, involved a dispute over the extent of injuries sustained by the plaintiff, a child pillion passenger on a motorcycle, in a motor vehicle accident. The liability of the defendant, the driver of the car, was not in dispute. The central issue before the court was to determine the degree of residual disabilities and injuries the plaintiff suffered, specifically whether the plaintiff had established a need for past or future commercial or domestic assistance, and if a loss of future earning capacity had been proven.

The court was required to carefully examine the medical evidence provided by both parties, assessing the plaintiff's physical and psychological conditions post-accident. This included evaluating the plaintiff's ability to perform daily activities, the extent of any permanent impairment, and the likelihood of future assistance needs. The court also needed to consider expert testimonies regarding the plaintiff’s future earning capacity, given the severity of the injuries.

In its reasoning, the court concluded that the plaintiff had indeed established a need for both past and future domestic assistance due to her significant physical and psychological impairments. The court found that the plaintiff’s injuries resulted in a substantial loss of future earning capacity. After weighing the evidence, the court awarded damages to the plaintiff in the sum of $77,768.31, which included compensation for pain and suffering, loss of amenities, and future domestic assistance. Additionally, the court ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs and mandated that the awarded amount be invested by the NSW Trustee and Guardian on behalf of the plaintiff until she reaches the age of 18.

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) Judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $77,768.31.

(2) The defendant is to pay the plaintiff’s costs of the proceedings as agreed or assessed.

(3) Liberty to the parties to apply within 14 days to vary the order in (2) above or to correct any mathematical errors in my calculations.

(4) Exhibits to be returned in 28 days.

(5) Pursuant to section 77 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), the amount referred to in order (1) is to be paid to the NSW Trustee and Guardian for investment on behalf of the plaintiff until she attains the age of 18 years.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.