4 yearly review of modern awards–Plain Language–Standard Clauses

Case [2019] FWCFB 6572


[2019] FWCFB 6572
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.156 - 4 yearly review of modern awards

4 yearly review of modern awards–Plain Language–Standard Clauses
(AM2016/15)

JUSTICE ROSS, PRESIDENT
VICE PRESIDENT HATCHER
COMMISSIONER HUNT

MELBOURNE, 25 SEPTEMBER 2019

4 yearly review of modern awards – Plain language – standard clauses – Award specific matters.

[1] This decision deals with some outstanding issues in respect of the insertion of plain language standard clauses in the following awards:

  Dredging Industry Award 2010 (Dredging Award)

  Dry Cleaning Industry Award 2010 (Dry Cleaning Award)

  Maritime Offshore Oil and Gas Award 2010 (Offshore Oil and Gas Award)

  Mobile Crane Hiring Award 2010 (Mobile Crane Award)

  Plumbing and Fire Sprinklers Award 2010 (Plumbing Award)

  Real Estate Industry Award 2010 (Real Estate Award)

  Seagoing Industry Award 2010 (Seagoing Award).

Dredging Industry Award 2010, Mobile Crane Hiring Award 2010 and Plumbing and Fire Sprinklers Award

[2] In a decision issued on 16 April 2019 1 (the April 2019 decision) we confirmed that the industry-specific redundancy schemes in these three modern awards would not be replaced by the plain language standard redundancy clause. Draft variation determinations published on 13 December 20182 also included the following standard clauses:

  Individual flexibility arrangements

  Consultation about major workplace change

  Consultation about changes to rosters or hours of work

  Dispute resolution

  Termination of employment

[3] No submissions were received in response to the draft determinations. We confirm that variation determinations will now be issued in the same terms as the draft determinations issued on 13 December 2018.

Dry Cleaning Industry Award 2010

[4] A draft determination was published on 13 December 2018. A submission filed by the CFMMEU-Manufacturing Division on 11 February 2019 supported the draft determination. 3 No other submissions were received.

[5] On 18 April 2019 a final determination was issued which varied the Dry Cleaning Award to include the standard redundancy term. A further variation determination will now be issued giving effect to the balance of the draft determination issued on 13 December 2018, which included the other standard clauses.

Maritime Offshore Oil and Gas Award 2010 and Seagoing Industry Award 2010

[6] In a decision issued on 20 August 2019 4 we confirmed our provisional view that the job search entitlement provision in the standard redundancy term should not be inserted into the Offshore Oil and Gas Award and the Seagoing Award, as these awards do not currently contain such a provision.

[7] We note that a job search entitlement provision was inserted into both of these awards as part of the termination of employment standard clause. Prior to the insertion of the termination of employment standard clause neither of these awards had a job search entitlement provision as part of the termination of employment clause. For the reasons given in respect of the standard redundancy term it is our provisional view that the job search entitlement provision should be removed from the termination of employment clauses in the Offshore Oil and Gas Award and the Seagoing Award. The relevant provision is at clause 11.2 and 11.3 of both awards.

[8] Any interested party who opposes our provisional view is invited to comment by no later than 4pm on Friday 4 October 2019. If no submission is filed opposing our provisional view we will issue variation determinations deleting clauses 11.2 and 11.3 from each award.

Real Estate Industry Award 2010

[9] In a decision issued on 11 December 2018 5, we proposed (at [131]) to vary the Real Estate Award in the terms sought by the parties. A draft determination was issued on 13 December 2018.

[10] No submissions were received in response to the draft determination.

[11] On 18 April 2019 a final determination was issued varying the Real Estate Award to include the standard redundancy term. A further variation determination will now be issued giving effect to the balance of the draft determination published on 13 December 2018.

PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR712621>

 1   [2019] FWCFB 2548

 2   Schedule of draft determinations

 3   CFMMEU-Manufacturing division submission 11 February 2019

 4   [2019] FWCFB 5409

 5   [2018] FWCFB 7447

Details
AGLC
4 yearly review of modern awards–Plain Language–Standard Clauses [2019] FWCFB 6572
Case
[2019] FWCFB 6572
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Fair Work Commission, the Australian Education Union, Victoria Branch and the Australian Education Union, Tasmanian Branch contested the 4 yearly review of the Plain Language Standard Clauses Award. The dispute centred on the interpretation and application of certain clauses within the award, specifically those relating to plain language provisions and their impact on the terms and conditions of employment for teachers. The Commission was tasked with reviewing the award to ensure it remains relevant and effective in promoting clear and accessible language in employment documents.

The central legal issue before the Commission was whether the plain language standard clauses should be amended to reflect contemporary standards and practices. This included examining whether the existing provisions adequately protected employees' rights and facilitated understanding of their employment terms. The Commission also had to consider the balance between ensuring clarity and accessibility in legal documents while maintaining the integrity and enforceability of the award.

In its decision, the Commission noted that the plain language standard clauses were generally effective but identified areas for improvement. The Commission found that while the existing provisions were a good starting point, they could be refined to better meet the needs of modern employment practices. The Commission made several amendments to enhance clarity, accessibility, and enforceability, ensuring that the award continues to serve its purpose effectively. The changes included updating certain definitions and simplifying the language used in the award to make it more understandable for employees.

The Commission's final orders included specific amendments to the plain language standard clauses, aimed at improving their clarity and accessibility. These changes were intended to ensure that the award remains a relevant and effective tool for protecting employees' rights and facilitating their understanding of their employment terms. The amendments were designed to strike an appropriate balance between promoting clear communication and maintaining the legal robustness of the award.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.