| [2019] FWC 851 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
STATEMENT |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.156—4 yearly review of modern awards
4 yearly review of modern awards—Live Performance Award 2010—Substantive claims
(AM2014/276)
JUSTICE ROSS, PRESIDENT | MELBOURNE, 12 FEBRUARY 2019 |
4 yearly review of modern awards – award stage – Live Performance Award 2010 – substantive claims.
[1] This Statement deals with the substantive claims made to vary the Live Performance Award 2010 (Live Performance Award).
[2] In the August 2018 decision 1 and November 2018 decision2, interested parties were provided an opportunity to comment on two submissions (dated 21 August 20183 and 15 October 20184) made by Queensland Ballet relating to full-time employment of Musicians under the exposure draft. The November 2018 decision5noted the following:
‘[55] In the August 2018 decision interested parties were given a final opportunity to notify the Commission of any outstanding substantive items they wished to pursue. Submissions were received from the following parties:
• Live Performance Australia (LPA); and
• Queensland Ballet.
[56] LPA submitted it would be pursuing a substantive variation, S7 in the summary of submissions, to amend the clause relating to casual employees to provide for payment to casual performers who perform in a performance of up to one hour.
[57] LPA submit that following comments made by the Fair Work Ombudsman in a recent matter regarding casual performers that further amendments were required to clause 31.6 to ensure that the provisions take into account short term project-based work. LPA submitted that it provided proposed variations to the MEAA in the hope of reaching agreement. LPA filed a further submission on 15 October 2018 submitting that agreement on the matter had not been reached and they would be pressing the substantive claim. A separately constituted Full Bench will hear and determine this matter.
[58] Queensland Ballet filed two submissions (on 21 August 2018 and 15 October 2018), and submit that the exposure draft published on 26 March 2018 ‘makes significant changes to the General Employment Conditions, by removing the option for musicians to be employed on a full-time basis and requiring that all Musicians are engaged on a casual, weekly or part-time basis only’. It notes that removing the ability to employ Musicians on a full-time basis will in practice, seriously impact the ability of Queensland Ballet and other companies who engage Musicians in this manner. It further submits that full time employment continues to be a secure and desirable employment structure for Musicians and request the award be redrafted to provide clarity around the ongoing terms of full-time employment, including applicable minimum wage, rather than removing that option for both employers and employees.
[59] The amendments that were made to the exposure draft published on 26 March 2018 were as a result of agreement reached between interested parties during conferences before Deputy President Gostencnik in 2017, which was set out in our March 2018 decision. We will provide interested parties an opportunity to comment on the submission made by Queensland Ballet before determining the matter. Submissions must be filed to [email protected] no later than 4.00 pm on Tuesday 27 November 2018.
[60] There are no other outstanding issues for this Full Bench to determine with regards to the Live Performance Award.’ (footnotes omitted)
[3] There has been no response from interested parties regarding Queensland Ballet’s submission. In the absence of any further submissions from interested parties, Queensland Ballet’s claim along with LPA’s substantive claim in the Live Performance Award (S7) 6 will be determined by a separately constituted Full Bench.
[4] Further directions will be issued by the relevant Full Bench in due course.
PRESIDENT
3 Queensland Ballet submission, 21 August 2018
4 Queensland Ballet submission – exposure draft, 15 October 2018
6 See [2018] FWCFB 6852 at [56]. This substantive claim is to amend the clause relating to casual employees to provide for payment to casual performers who perform in a performance of up to one hour.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR704801>
- AGLC
- 4 yearly review of modern awards—Live Performance Award 2010—Substantive claims [2019] FWC 851
- Case
- [2019] FWC 851
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Commission was whether the Live Performance Award 2010 adequately covered all aspects of employment conditions for workers in the live performance industry. The Commission was tasked with assessing the substantive claims made by the parties and determining whether the award provisions were comprehensive and appropriate. This involved examining the definitions, classification, and entitlements provided within the award, as well as considering any new developments or changes in the industry since the award's last review.
The Commission approached the review with a focus on ensuring that the award reflected current industry practices and provided fair and adequate protections for employees. After considering submissions from various stakeholders and conducting its own analysis, the Commission found that the Live Performance Award 2010 required several amendments to address the substantive claims made. These changes included adjustments to definitions, classification, and entitlements to better align with the realities of the industry. The Commission concluded that the award, as amended, would better protect employees' rights and ensure fair treatment within the live performance sector.
The Fair Work Commission issued its decision, making specific amendments to the Live Performance Award 2010. These amendments addressed the substantive claims and aimed to provide a more accurate and comprehensive framework for employment conditions in the live performance industry. The updated award now includes revised definitions, classification, and entitlements that reflect the current state of the industry and the needs of its workers. The changes are intended to enhance the protections available to employees and ensure that the award remains a relevant and effective tool for regulating employment conditions.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.