QUEENSLAND CIVIL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
CITATION:
2K Constructions Pty Ltd and Anor v QBCC No 2 [2023] QCAT 83
PARTIES:
2K Constructions pty ltd (applicant)
v
queensland building and construction commission (respondent)
APPLICATION NO/S:
GAR028-19
GAR029-20
MATTER TYPE:
Building matters
DELIVERED ON:
27 February 2023
HEARING DATE:
On the papers
HEARD AT:
Brisbane
DECISION OF:
Member King-Scott
ORDERS:
1. Queensland Building and Construction Commission pay 2K Constructions Pty Ltd its costs fixed at $35,000.00 by 4:00 pm 31 March 2023.
2. Application by Shandon International Pty Ltd is dismissed.
CATCHWORDS:
PROCEDURE – CIVIL PROCEEDINGS IN STATE AND TERRITORY COURTS – COSTS – unnecessarily disadvantaging a party – interests of justice
PROCEDURE – CIVIL PROCEEDINGS IN STATE AND TERRITORY COURTS – reopening application s 138 Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld)
Queensland Building and Construction Commission Act 1991 (Qld), s 77.
Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld), s 138
Brisbane Marine Pilots Pty Ltd v General Manager Marine Safety Qld [2022] QCAT 225
Marzini v Health Ombudsman (No 4) [2020] QCAT 365
Ralacom Pty Ltd v Body Corporate for Paradise Island Apartments (No2) [2010] QCAT 412
Thompson v Cannon [2020] QCAT 109
Turner v Macrossan & Amiet Pty Ltd (No 2) (2016] QCAT 255
Valuers Board of Queensland v Murphy [2022] QCAT 295
APPEARANCES & REPRESENTATION:
This matter was heard and determined on the papers pursuant to s 32 of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld)
Applicant:
L.D. Bowden of Counsel, instructed by Mr N Radlich
Respondent:
S Nean solicitor for the Commission
B Hartnet solicitor for Shandon International Pty Ltd
REASONS FOR DECISION
This matter was heard in May 2022 and my decision was delivered on 24 October 2022. I invited the parties to make written submissions in respect to costs. Those have now been received.
The Applicant 2K Constructions Pty Ltd (2K Constructions) was successful in its claim to set aside the Direction to Rectify and the Scope of Works decisions. Shandon International Pty Ltd (Shandon) was unsuccessful in setting aside the decision of the Queensland Building and Construction Commission (the Commission).
2K Constructions seeks an award of costs of $55,589.36 from the Commission
The Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld) (QCAT Act) provides:
100Each party usually bears own costs
Other than as provided under this Act or an enabling Act, each party to a proceeding must bear the party's own costs for the proceeding.
102Costs against party in interests of Justice
(1) The tribunal may make an order requiring a party to a proceeding to pay all or a stated part of the costs of another party to the proceeding if the tribunal considers the interests of justice require it to make the order.
(2) …
(3) In deciding whether to award costs under subsection (1) or (2) the tribunal may have regard to the following-
(a)whether a party to a proceeding is acting in a way that unnecessarily disadvantages another party to the proceeding, including as mentioned in…
Continue reading 2K Constructions Pty Ltd v QBCC No 2
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- 2K Constructions Pty Ltd v QBCC No 2 [2023] QCAT 83
- Case
- [2023] QCAT 83
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues for the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT) to determine were whether the Commission should pay 2K Constructions' costs and whether Shandon's application for reopening, correction, renewal or amendment of the earlier decision should be granted. The QCAT considered the relevant legislation, case law and submissions from both parties.
In its decision, the QCAT noted the divergence of opinion on how the discretion to award costs should be exercised. While some cases suggest that an order for costs should not be made unless there are compelling reasons, other cases treat the power to award costs as a discretionary source of power in the interests of justice. The QCAT found that on either basis, the Commission should pay 2K Constructions' costs. The Tribunal considered the financial consequences faced by 2K Constructions, the complexity of the matter, and the respective financial positions of the parties. The QCAT also found that the Commission had unnecessarily disadvantaged 2K Constructions by proceeding with the Direction to Rectify on a misunderstanding of the evidence. The Tribunal fixed 2K Constructions' costs at $35,000.00. Shandon's application for reopening, correction, renewal or amendment of the earlier decision was dismissed as it lacked detail, was not made at the hearing, and all the material had been available to the public for several years.
The final orders of the Tribunal were that the Commission should pay 2K Constructions' costs in the amount of $35,000.00 by 4:00 pm on 31 March 2023, and Shandon's application for reopening, correction, renewal or amendment of the earlier decision was dismissed.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.