WN Hillas & Co Ltd v Arcos Ltd

Link copied
Case Copied 38 min read

    Parliamentary Archives,
    HL/PO/JU/4/3/871

    Die Martis, 5° Julii, 1932.

    After hearing Counsel, as well on Tuesday the
    3d as on Thursday the 5th and Friday the 6th,
    days of May last, upon the Petition and Appeal
    of W. N Hillas and Company, Limited, whose
    Registered Office is situate at Mail Buildings,
    Jameson Street, Hull, praying, That the matter of
    the Order set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely
    an Order of His Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the
    28th of July 1931, might be reviewed before His
    Majesty the King, in His Court of Parliament,
    ami that the said Order might be reversed,
    varied, or altered, or that the Petitioners might
    have such other relief in the premises as to His
    Majesty the King, in His Court of Parliament,
    might seem meet; as also upon the printed Case
    of Arcos, Limited, lodged in answer to the said
    Appeal; and due consideration had this day of
    what was offered on either side in this Cause :

    It is Ordered and Adjudged, by the Lords
    Spiritual and Temporal in the Court of Parlia-
    ment of His Majesty the King assembled, That
    the said Order of His Majesty's Court of Appeal,
    of the 28th day of July 1931, complained of in
    the said Appeal, be, and the same is hereby,
    Reversed, and that the Judgment of the Honour-
    able Mr. Justice MacKinnon, of the 12th day of
    June 1931, thereby set aside, be, and the same is
    hereby, Restored : And it is further Ordered,
    That the Respondents do pay, or cause to be paid,
    to the said Appellants the Costs incurred by them
    in the Court of Appeal, and also the Costs in-
    curred by them in respect of the said Appeal to
    this House, the amount of such last-mentioned
    Costs to be certified by the Clerk of the Parlia-
    ment And it is also further Ordered, That the
    Cause be, and the same is hereby, remitted back
    to the King's Bench Division of the High Court
    of justice. to do therein as shall be just and con-
    sistent with this Judgment.

    W. N. Hillas and Company,Limited v. Arcos, Limited.

    (6/32) (15760r-44) Wt. 120-27 30 7/32 P..St. G.311

    Lord Tomlin
    Lord War-rigton of Clyffe
    Lord Thankerton.
    Lord Macmillan
    Lord Wright

    W. N. HILLAS & CO., LTD.

    v.
    ARCOS, LTD.

    Lord Tomlin.

    My Lords,

    On the 28th July, 1931, the Court of Appeal ordered a judg-
    ment in the Appellants' favour against the Respondents for
    £30,000 damages with costs to be set aside and directed judgment
    to be entered for the Respondents.

    The action was one in which the Appellants sought to make
    the Respondents liable in damages for breach of a contract for the
    sale and purchase of Russian softwood timber for delivery in 1931
    alleged to have been constituted by a document in writing signed
    by the representatives of the parties on the 21st May, 1930, and
    a letter dated the 22nd December, 1930, written by the Appellants
    to the Respondents and…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read WN Hillas & Co Ltd v Arcos Ltd and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[1932] UKHL 2
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.