Parliamentary
Archives,
HL/PO/JU/4/3/871
Die Martis, 5° Julii, 1932.
After
hearing Counsel, as well on Tuesday the
3d as on Thursday the 5th
and Friday the 6th,
days of May last, upon the Petition and
Appeal
of W. N Hillas and Company, Limited, whose
Registered
Office is situate at Mail Buildings,
Jameson Street, Hull,
praying, That the matter of
the Order set forth in the Schedule
thereto, namely
an Order of His Majesty's Court of Appeal, of
the
28th of July 1931, might be reviewed before His
Majesty the
King, in His Court of Parliament,
ami that the said Order might be
reversed,
varied, or altered, or that the Petitioners might
have
such other relief in the premises as to His
Majesty the King, in
His Court of Parliament,
might seem meet; as also upon the printed
Case
of Arcos, Limited, lodged in answer to the said
Appeal;
and due consideration had this day of
what was offered on either
side in this Cause :
It is
Ordered and Adjudged, by the Lords
Spiritual and
Temporal in the Court of Parlia-
ment of His Majesty the King
assembled, That
the said Order of His Majesty's Court of
Appeal,
of the 28th day of July 1931, complained of in
the said
Appeal, be, and the same is hereby,
Reversed, and that the
Judgment of the Honour-
able Mr. Justice MacKinnon, of the 12th
day of
June 1931, thereby set aside, be, and the same is
hereby,
Restored : And it is further Ordered,
That the Respondents
do pay, or cause to be paid,
to the said Appellants the Costs
incurred by them
in the Court of Appeal, and also the Costs
in-
curred by them in respect of the said Appeal to
this House,
the amount of such last-mentioned
Costs to be certified by the
Clerk of the Parlia-
ment And it is also further Ordered, That
the
Cause be, and the same is hereby, remitted back
to the
King's Bench Division of the High Court
of justice. to do therein
as shall be just and con-
sistent with this Judgment.
W. N. Hillas and Company,Limited v. Arcos, Limited.
(6/32) (15760r-44) Wt. 120-27 30 7/32 P..St. G.311
Lord Tomlin
Lord War-rigton of Clyffe
Lord
Thankerton.
Lord Macmillan
Lord Wright
W. N. HILLAS & CO., LTD.
v.
ARCOS,
LTD.
Lord Tomlin.
My Lords,
On the
28th July, 1931, the Court of Appeal ordered a judg-
ment in the
Appellants' favour against the Respondents for
£30,000
damages with costs to be set aside and directed judgment
to be
entered for the Respondents.
The action
was one in which the Appellants sought to make
the Respondents
liable in damages for breach of a contract for the
sale and
purchase of Russian softwood timber for delivery in 1931
alleged
to have been constituted by a document in writing signed
by the
representatives of the parties on the 21st May, 1930, and
a letter
dated the 22nd December, 1930, written by the Appellants
to the
Respondents and…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read WN Hillas & Co Ltd v Arcos Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [1932] UKHL 2
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
AI summary not yet generated for this case.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.