St Aubyn v Attorney General (No.2)

Link copied
Case Copied 81 min read

    Die Jovis, 12° Julii 1951

    Parliamentary Archives,
    HL/PO/JU/4/3/1010

    HOUSE OF LORDS

    Lord

    Simonds

    Lord
    Normand

    Lord

    Oaksey

    Lord
    Radcliffe

    Lord
    Tucker

    ST. AUBYN AND OTHERS

    v.
    ATTORNEY-GENERAL (on behalf of His Majesty), et e contra

    12th July, 1951.

    Lord Simonds

    MY LORDS,

    This appeal and cross appeal are brought from an order of the Court
    of Appeal, by which that Court as to the subject matter of the appeal
    reversed an order of Croom-Johnson, J., and as to the subject matter
    of the cross-appeal thought fit to make no order.

    The facts of the case are somewhat involved but present no real difficulty.
    It is in the application to them of the relevant sections of the Finance
    Act, 1940, that I have found it impossible to reach any conclusion that is
    wholly satisfactory.

    I will give a broad outline of the relevant facts supplementing it as
    occasion demands.

    Immediately before the execution by the late Lord St. Levan, who died
    on the 10th November, 1940, and to whom I will refer as Lord St. Levan,
    of the instruments dated in March, 1927, which are next mentioned, he was,
    under a Resettlement dated the 26th April, 1879, tenant for life in
    possession of certain settled property consisting of (a) freehold lands in
    the counties of Devon and Cornwall (b) investments representing capital
    moneys arising under the Resettlement and (c) equitable interests which by
    virtue of the Law of Property Act, 1925, represented certain undivided
    shares in land which at the date when that Act came into operation were
    subject to the Resettlement. The whole of the settled property was under
    the Resettlement and a Deed Poll dated the 9th January, 1905, subject to
    an overriding general power of appointment exercisable by Lord St. Levan
    and Sydney Alexander Ponsonby (hereinafter called " Mr. Ponsonby ") who
    was one of the trustees of the Resettlement but had no beneficial interest
    thereunder. The subsequent limitations of the Resettlement, as varied by
    the said Deed Poll and other instruments, were such as to cause the settled
    property to devolve together with the Barony of St. Levan, which on the
    death of Lord St. Levan without having had a son devolved on and is now
    held by his nephew Francis Cecil St. Aubyn.

    On the 21st March, 1927, St. Aubyn Estates Ltd. (hereinafter called
    " the Company ") was incorporated under the Companies Acts, 1908 to 1917
    (by the name of St. Aubyn Settled Properties Ltd. which was afterwards
    changed) with a nominal capital of £200,000 divided into 200,000 shares
    of £1 each with power to issue any part of its capital with such preferential
    rights as might be thought expedient. The Company's Memorandum of
    Association was subscribed by seven persons, including Lord St. Levan and
    Mr. Ponsonby, each of whom agreed to take one share. These seven shares
    were held by the subscribers as nominees of the Trustees of the Resettle-
    ment. By the Company's Articles of Association it was provided that Lord
    St. Levan…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read St Aubyn v Attorney General (No.2) and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[1951] UKHL 3
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.