Kipoi Holdings Mauritius Limited v Robert Michael Kirman and Robert Conry Brauer as joint and several administrators of Tiger Resources Limited (Subject to Deed of Company Arrangement) [No 4]
[2024] WASCA 145
Citation 1
(Para 2)
…as whether the Supreme Court had power to order payment of interest and, if so, whether in the present case it was proper to exercise that power. [3] Rodger v The Comptoir D'Escompte de Paris (1871) LR 3 PC 465.…
Northern Territory v Griffiths
[2019] HCA 7
Citation 2
(Para 10)
…[446] Heavener v Loomes (1924) 34 CLR 306 at 323-324; [1924] HCA 10; The Commonwealth v McCormack (1984) 155 CLR 273 at 276-277; [1984] HCA 57. [447] Rodger v The Comptoir d'Escompte de Paris (1871) LR 3 PC 465 at 475-476.…
Woolworths Ltd v Strong (No 2)
[2011] NSWCA 72
Citation 3
…has satisfied a judgment for the payment of money is entitled, on the reversal of the judgment, to repayment of the money paid by him with interest: Rodger v The Comptoir D'Escompte de Paris (1871) LR 3 PC 465, Merchant Banking Co v Maud (1874) LR 18 Eq 659. In the former case, Lord Cairns said (1871) LR 3 PC at p 475:…
Cornwall v Rowan (No 2)
[2005] SASC 122
Citation 4
…rt Act 1935 (SA) s 30C, s 40 and s 114; Supreme Court Rules 1987 (SA) r 84.19 and r 101.02, referred to. Commonwealth v McCormack (1984) 155 CLR 273; Rodger v The Comptoir D'Escompte de Paris (1871) LR 3 PC 465; Heydon v NRMA Ltd & Ors (No.2) (2001) 53 NSWLR 600; Road & Traffic Authority v Ryan (No.2) [2002] NSWCA 128; Gould v Vaggelas (1985) 157…
Commonwealth v McCormack
[1984] HCA 57
Citation 5
…4. Restitutio in integrum is the right of every successful appellant: per Lord Field in Cox v. Hakes (1890) 15 App Cas 506, at p 547. An appellant who has satisfied a judgment for the payment of money is entitled, on the reversal of the judgment, to repayment of the money paid by him with interest: …
Idemitsu Queensland Pty Ltd v Agipcoal Australia Pty Ltd
[1993] QCA 565
Citation 6
…s of this Court on 24 March 1993, with interest on the amount of repayments from the date of payment of the original sum until the date of repayment: Rodger v The Comptoir D'Escompte de Paris (1871) LR 3 PC 465 at 475-7, Merchant Banking Co. v Maud (1874) 18 L.R.Eq 659, The Commonwealth v McCormack (1984) 155 CLR 273 at 276.…
State Bank of New South Wales Ltd v FCT
[1995] FCA 893
Citation 7
…(a) Rodger v The Comptoir D'Escompte de Paris (1871) LR 3 PC 465, a case where the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council ordered the payment of interest on moneys paid pursuant to a court order that was set aside on appeal; (b) Johnson v The King [1904] AC 817, a case where the Judicial Committee set aside an order for payment of interest on mo…
Wollong Pty Ltd v Shoalhaven City Council
[2002] NSWLEC 164
Citation 8
…siter v Hutchinson (1987) 10 NSWLR 525; Production Spray Painting & Panel Beating Pty Ltd and Others v Newnham and Others (No 2) (1992) 27 NSWLR 659; Rodger v The Comptoir d'Escompte de Paris (1871) LR 3 PC 465; Smallacombe v Lockyer Investment Co Pty Ltd (1993) 42 FCR 97; Victorian WorkCover Authority v Esso Australia Ltd (2001) 75 ALJR 1513 DAT…