Legal Research
Cases
Rhodes v Rhodes (New Zealand)

Rhodes v Rhodes (New Zealand)

Case [1882] UKPC 15

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is coming soon as we're improving how the document is presented.

Details

Case: [1882] UKPC 15
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Most Recent Citation

Fry v Georges [2009] VSC 220

Cases Citing This Decision

12

In the Estate of LESSES (DECEASED) [2013] SASC 23
Citation 1 (Para 2)

…105 CLR 153; [1961] ALR 831; Re Duane (1862) 2 Sw and Tr 590; 164 ER 1127; Fulton v Andrew (1875) LR 7 HL 448; [1874-80] All ER Rep 1240; Rhodes v Rhodes (1882) 7 App Cas 192, at p. 198, and Re Hemburrow, deceased [1969] VicRp 98; , [1969] VR 764. 3. Whilst probate may be granted in an appropriate case with words omitted…
Re Swain (Dawn) [2008] NSWSC 1343
Citation 2

…849 Re Brisbane (Powell J 19/06/1992 unreported) Re Burrows (1906) 6 SR (NSW) 606 Re Hogg (Young J 12/03/2001 unreported) Re Johnson [1953] 4 DLR 777 Rhodes v Rhodes (1882) 7 App Cas 192 Sophron v Nominal Defendant (1957) 96 CLR 469 Trimmer v Lax [1997] NSWSC 189 Trustee of the AW Furse No 5 Will Trust v Federal Commissi…
Tu v Tu Estate of Tu [2008] NSWSC 458
Citation 3

…Hempel [1960] SR(NSW) 147 at 149 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298. Kerr v Badran [2004] NSWSC 735 Nock v Austin (1918) 25 CLR 519 Rhodes v Rhodes (1882) 7 AC 192 at 198; Worth v Clasohm (1952) 86 CLR 439 PARTIES: Margaret Sze Tu and Helen Sze Tu (Plaintiffs) Mary Sze Tu (Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S): SC 119303 of 2005 COU…
Rennes and Anor v Death and Ors [2003] NSWSC 708
Citation 4

…485 (68 ER 602) Re Roberts; Repington v Roberts-Gawen (1881) 19 Ch D 520 Smidmore v Smidmore (1905) 3 CLR 344 Re Doland's Will Trusts [1970] 1 Ch 267 Rhodes v Rhodes (1882) 7 App Cas 192 Osborne v Smith (1960) 105 CLR 153 Lloyd v Frape (1922) 23 SR(NSW) 11 Re Grosvenor [1916] 2 Ch 375 Re Hewett [1920] 90 LJ Ch 126 PARTIE…
Romano v Romano [2003] NSWSC 436
Citation 5

…CITATION: ROMANO v. ROMANO & ANOR [2003] NSWSC 436 HEARING DATE(S): 19 and 20 May 2003 JUDGMENT DATE: 30 May 2003 JURISDICTION: PROBATE JUDGMENT OF: Bryson J at 1 DECISION: Grant probate of will and codicil, pronounce against informal document [79] CATCHWORDS: WILLS - testamentary instruments - test…
In Re Donohoe: Trevor Thomas Donohoe v Tracey Jane Donohoe (No 2) [1988] TASSC 31
Citation 6 (Para 1)

…In Rhodes v Rhodes & Ors (1882) 7 App Cas 192 the Privy Council referred to In the Goods of Duane ( supra ) as illustrative of those cases and said at p 198:…
Osborne v Smith [1960] HCA 89
Citation 7

…10. It is undoubted law that a court of probate has jurisdiction, in an appropriate case, to grant probate, or administration c.t.a. in respect of a portion only of a document which has been executed as a will, omitting other portions as having formed no part of that to which the execution of the do…
The State of Western Australia v Illey [2006] WASC 290
Citation 8

…R 112 Re Ward (Dec); Marsden v Ward, unreported; SCt of WA; Library No 980180; 9 April 1998 Re Wragg (decd); Hollingsworth v Wragg [1959] 1 WLR 922 Rhodes v Rhodes (1882) App Cas 192 Roddy v Fitzgerald (1858) 6 HL Cas 823 Sayer v Sayer (1849) 7 Hare 377 Seale v Rawlins [1892] AC 342 Shore v Wilson (1842) 9 Cl & Fin 355 S…
Haberfield v Larsson [2023] VSC 161
Citation 9 (Para 1)

…ine of opening submissions dated 16 November 2020 (‘plaintiffs’ opening outline’) [48]; plaintiffs’ closing written submissions [179]. [31] Rhodes v Rhodes (1882) LR 7 App Cas 192, 199-200; Nicholson v Knaggs [2009] VSC 64 [97] and cases there discussed. See also Roche v Roche [2017] SASC 8 [32] which is set out above.…
Veall & Anor v Veall [2014] VSC 38
Citation 10 (Para 1)

…The testator does not need to comprehend fully the legal effect of the words used in the will.[156] [156] Rhodes v Rhodes (1882) LR 7 App Cas 192, 199–200.…
Nicholson v Knaggs [No 3 - Severance And Costs] [2009] VSC 328
Citation 11

…lied, as, for example, where by fraud or mistake there has been included in the instrument words which in truth were not part of the testator's will: Rhodes v Rhodes (1882) 7 App Cas 192, at p198: "In that case you may strike out the passage, because he did not know it was there or intend that it should be, and therefore…
Fry v Georges [2009] VSC 220
Citation 12

…in granting probate is not entitled to omit a word or words from the will, the result of which would be to alter the sense of those which remained: Rhodes v Rhodes (1882) 7 App Cas 192, at p. 198; Re Horrocks , supra , ([1939] P) at pp. 218-20; Osborne v Smith , supra , (105 CLR), at p. 160. "The cases in which the court…

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0

AI Chat isn't available for this judgment.