Die Jovis, 1° Martii 1951
Parliamentary
Archives,
HL/PO/JU/4/3/1010
Lord
Chancellor
Lord
Porter
Lord
Normand
Lord
Oaksey
Lord
Radcliffe
HOUSE OF LORDS
READING
v.
ATTORNEY-GENERAL (on behalf of His Majesty)
Lord Porter
MY LORDS,
The Lord Chancellor, who is
unable to be present today, asks me to say
that he concurs in the
opinion I am about to deliver.
Lord Porter
MY LORDS,
This is an Appeal from an Order
of the Court of Appeal dated the 19th
May, 1949, affirming the
judgment of the Honourable Mr. Justice Denning
(as he then was),
and ordering that the Suppliant's Appeal from the said
judgment be
dismissed with costs to be paid by the Suppliant to the Crown
or
its Solicitor, such costs to be taxed by a Taxing Master.
In 1944 and 1945 certain sums,
all in Egyptian currency, amounting in all
to £E18,842.105,
equivalent to £19,325 4s. 8d. in sterling, and held by or
on
behalf of the Suppliant, were seized and taken into possession on
behalf
of His Majesty.
By Petition of Right presented
on the 1st November, 1946, the Suppliant
sought to recover these
sums or their sterling equivalent (allowance being
made for sums
released to him), as money had and received by His Majesty
to his
use.
The Respondent admitted that
these sums had been seized and taken
into possession on behalf of
His Majesty but alleged that they represented
part of the proceeds
of bribery and that the Suppliant was accountable
therefor to His
Majesty and received and held them in trust for His
Majesty.
Alternatively he claimed that the Respondent was entitled
to set them off
against the Suppliant's Claim.
The facts proved or agreed in
the Action are not in dispute and may
succinctly be stated
substantially in the form adopted by the Appellant in
his case and
are as follows : -
(A) In 1943 and 1944 the
Appellant was a Sergeant in the Royal
Army Medical Corps and
receiving pay at the rate appropriate to his
Rank. He was
employed as a Sergeant in charge of medical stores at
No. 63
General Hospital, Cairo.
(B) On the 14th March, 1944, he
dictated and signed a statement to
Lieutenant Brooks of the
Special Investigation Branch, Middle East,
that he had received
in all some £20,000 from a man named Manole
in the following
circumstances:
Some time about the beginning of
1943, when having coffee at
Alexandria whilst on leave, he was
asked by a man, who apparently
knew him but whom he did not know,
whether he would assist by
selling cases of whisky and brandy to
agents in Cairo for which he
would get a few pounds. The Appellant
expressed his willingness and
was told that someone would get into
contact with him outside the
2
hospital gates at Helmeih and
tell him what he had to do. About a
month later Manole met him
there, told him a lorry was coming at
a specified time to a place
which was pointed out…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Reading v AttorneyGeneral and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [1951] UKHL 1
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
AI summary not yet generated for this case.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.