Reading v AttorneyGeneral

Link copied
Case Copied 13 min read

    Die Jovis, 1° Martii 1951

    Parliamentary Archives,
    HL/PO/JU/4/3/1010

    Lord
    Chancellor

    Lord
    Porter

    Lord
    Normand

    Lord
    Oaksey

    Lord
    Radcliffe

    HOUSE OF LORDS

    READING
    v.

    ATTORNEY-GENERAL (on behalf of His Majesty)

    Lord Porter

    MY LORDS,

    The Lord Chancellor, who is unable to be present today, asks me to say
    that he concurs in the opinion I am about to deliver.

    Lord Porter

    MY LORDS,

    This is an Appeal from an Order of the Court of Appeal dated the 19th
    May, 1949, affirming the judgment of the Honourable Mr. Justice Denning
    (as he then was), and ordering that the Suppliant's Appeal from the said
    judgment be dismissed with costs to be paid by the Suppliant to the Crown
    or its Solicitor, such costs to be taxed by a Taxing Master.

    In 1944 and 1945 certain sums, all in Egyptian currency, amounting in all
    to £E18,842.105, equivalent to £19,325 4s. 8d. in sterling, and held by or
    on behalf of the Suppliant, were seized and taken into possession on behalf
    of His Majesty.

    By Petition of Right presented on the 1st November, 1946, the Suppliant
    sought to recover these sums or their sterling equivalent (allowance being
    made for sums released to him), as money had and received by His Majesty
    to his use.

    The Respondent admitted that these sums had been seized and taken
    into possession on behalf of His Majesty but alleged that they represented
    part of the proceeds of bribery and that the Suppliant was accountable
    therefor to His Majesty and received and held them in trust for His Majesty.
    Alternatively he claimed that the Respondent was entitled to set them off
    against the Suppliant's Claim.

    The facts proved or agreed in the Action are not in dispute and may
    succinctly be stated substantially in the form adopted by the Appellant in
    his case and are as follows : -

    (A) In 1943 and 1944 the Appellant was a Sergeant in the Royal
    Army Medical Corps and receiving pay at the rate appropriate to his
    Rank. He was employed as a Sergeant in charge of medical stores at
    No. 63 General Hospital, Cairo.

    (B) On the 14th March, 1944, he dictated and signed a statement to
    Lieutenant Brooks of the Special Investigation Branch, Middle East,
    that he had received in all some £20,000 from a man named Manole
    in the following circumstances:

    Some time about the beginning of 1943, when having coffee at
    Alexandria whilst on leave, he was asked by a man, who apparently
    knew him but whom he did not know, whether he would assist by
    selling cases of whisky and brandy to agents in Cairo for which he
    would get a few pounds. The Appellant expressed his willingness and
    was told that someone would get into contact with him outside the


    2

    hospital gates at Helmeih and tell him what he had to do. About a
    month later Manole met him there, told him a lorry was coming at
    a specified time to a place which was pointed out…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Reading v AttorneyGeneral and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[1951] UKHL 1
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.