R v Howe

Case [1986] UKHL 4


    Parliamentary Archives,
    HL/PO/JU/18/247

    Regina

    v.

    Clarkson (Appellant)
    (On Appeal from the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division))

    JUDGMENT

    Die Jovis 19° Februarii 1987

    Upon Report from the Appellate Committee to whom was
    referred the Cause Regina against Clarkson, That the

    Committee had heard Counsel on Monday the 17th, Tuesday the
    18th, Wednesday the 19th and Thursday the 20th days of
    November 1986, upon the Petition and Appeal of William George
    Clarkson, currently detained at Her Majesty's Prison,
    Leicester Road, Market Harborough, Leicestershire, praying
    that the matter of the Order set forth in the Schedule
    thereto, namely an Order of Her Majesty's Court of Appeal
    (Criminal Division) of 27th January 1986, might be reviewed
    before Her Majesty the Queen in Her Court of Parliament and
    that the said Order might be reversed, varied or altered or
    that the Petitioner might have such other relief in the
    premises as to Her Majesty the Queen in Her Court of
    Parliament might seem meet; and Counsel having been heard on
    behalf of the Director of Public Prosecutions (on behalf of
    Her Majesty), the respondent to the said appeal; and due
    consideration had this day of what was offered on either side
    in this Cause:

    It is Ordered and Adjudged, by the Lords Spiritual and
    Temporal in the Court of Parliament of Her Majesty the Queen
    assembled, That the said Order of Her Majesty's Court of
    Appeal (Criminal Division) of 27th January 1986 complained of
    in the said Appeal be, and the same is hereby, Affirmed; That
    the first Certified Question be answered in the negative; That
    the second and third Certified Questions be answered in the
    affirmative; and That the said Petition and Appeal be, and
    the same is hereby, dismissed this House.

    Cler: Parliamentor:

    Judgment: 19.2.87

    HOUSE OF LORDS

    REGINA
    v.

    BURKE
    (APPELLANT)

    (ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL (CRIMINAL

    DIVISION))

    REGINA
    v.

    HOWE
    (APPELLANT)

    (ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL (CRIMINAL

    DIVISION))

    REGINA
    v.

    BANNISTER
    (APPELLANT)

    (ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL (CRIMINAL

    DIVISION))

    (CONJOINED APPEALS)

    REGINA

    v.

    CLARKSON
    (APPELLANT)

    (ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL (CRIMINAL

    DIVISION))

    Lord Chancellor
    Lord Bridge of Harwich
    Lord Brandon of Oakbrook
    Lord Griffiths
    Lord Mackay of Clashfern


    THE LORD HAILSHAM OF ST. MARYLEBONE

    My Lords,

    These appeals arise from two cases, one originating from a
    trial in the Manchester Crown Court before Jupp J. and a jury,
    (Howe and Bannister) and one in the Central Criminal Court before
    the then Common Sergeant, Judge Tudor Price and a jury (Burke
    and Clarkson).

    - 1 -

    Howe and Bannister were tried with two other defendants
    (Murray and Bailey) both of whom during the trial changed their
    plea to one of guilty and were appropriately sentenced.

    The indictment in the case of Howe, Bannister, Murray and
    Bailey accused the four men of two murders (Elgar and Pollitt)
    and a conspiracy to murder (Redfern, an intended victim who
    escaped in time). The three counts related to three successive
    days, respectively 10, 11 and 12 October 1983.

Continue reading R v Howe

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
Case
[1986] UKHL 4
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.