Parliamentary
Archives,
HL/PO/JU/18/247
Regina
v.
Clarkson
(Appellant)
(On Appeal from the Court of Appeal
(Criminal Division))
JUDGMENT
Die Jovis 19° Februarii 1987
Upon Report from the Appellate Committee to
whom was
referred the Cause Regina against Clarkson, That the
Committee had heard Counsel on Monday the 17th,
Tuesday the
18th, Wednesday the 19th and Thursday the 20th days
of
November 1986, upon the Petition and Appeal of William
George
Clarkson, currently detained at Her Majesty's
Prison,
Leicester Road, Market Harborough, Leicestershire,
praying
that the matter of the Order set forth in the
Schedule
thereto, namely an Order of Her Majesty's Court of
Appeal
(Criminal Division) of 27th January 1986, might be
reviewed
before Her Majesty the Queen in Her Court of Parliament
and
that the said Order might be reversed, varied or altered
or
that the Petitioner might have such other relief in
the
premises as to Her Majesty the Queen in Her Court
of
Parliament might seem meet; and Counsel having been heard
on
behalf of the Director of Public Prosecutions (on behalf of
Her
Majesty), the respondent to the said appeal; and due
consideration
had this day of what was offered on either side
in this Cause:
It is Ordered and Adjudged, by
the Lords Spiritual and
Temporal in the Court of Parliament of Her
Majesty the Queen
assembled, That the said Order of Her Majesty's
Court of
Appeal (Criminal Division) of 27th January 1986
complained of
in the said Appeal be, and the same is hereby,
Affirmed; That
the first Certified Question be answered in
the negative; That
the second and third Certified Questions be
answered in the
affirmative; and That the said Petition and Appeal
be, and
the same is hereby, dismissed this House.
Cler: Parliamentor:
Judgment: 19.2.87
HOUSE OF LORDS
REGINA
v.
BURKE
(APPELLANT)
(ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL (CRIMINAL
DIVISION))
REGINA
v.
HOWE
(APPELLANT)
(ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL (CRIMINAL
DIVISION))
REGINA
v.
BANNISTER
(APPELLANT)
(ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL (CRIMINAL
DIVISION))
(CONJOINED APPEALS)
REGINA
v.
CLARKSON
(APPELLANT)
(ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL (CRIMINAL
DIVISION))
Lord Chancellor
Lord Bridge of
Harwich
Lord Brandon of Oakbrook
Lord Griffiths
Lord Mackay
of Clashfern
THE LORD HAILSHAM OF ST. MARYLEBONE
My Lords,
These appeals
arise from two cases, one originating from a
trial in the
Manchester Crown Court before Jupp J. and a jury,
(Howe and
Bannister) and one in the Central Criminal Court before
the then
Common Sergeant, Judge Tudor Price and a jury (Burke
and
Clarkson).
- 1 -
Howe and
Bannister were tried with two other defendants
(Murray and Bailey)
both of whom during the trial changed their
plea to one of guilty
and were appropriately sentenced.
The indictment
in the case of Howe, Bannister, Murray and
Bailey accused the four
men of two murders (Elgar and Pollitt)
and a conspiracy to murder
(Redfern, an intended victim who
escaped in time). The three
counts related to three successive
days, respectively 10, 11 and
12 October 1983.
Continue reading R v Howe
Sign in free to access the full text
- Case
- [1986] UKHL 4
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
AI summary not yet generated for this case.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.