Parliamentary
Archives,
HL/PO/JU/18/255
Regina
v.
Clegg
(Appellant)
(On Appeal from the Court of Appeal in Northern
Ireland)
JUDGMENT
Die Jovis 19° Januarii 1995
Upon Report from the Appellate Committee to
whom was
referred the Cause Regina against Clegg, That the
Committee had
heard Counsel as well on Wednesday the 9th as on
Thursday the
10th days of November last upon the Petition and
Appeal of Lee
William Clegg currently detained at Her Majesty's
Prison,
Wakefield, praying that the matter of the Order set forth
in the
first Schedule thereto, namely an Order of Her Majesty's
Court
of Appeal in Northern Ireland of the 30th day of March
1994,
might be reviewed before Her Majesty the Queen in Her Court
of
Parliament and that the said Order might be reversed, varied
or
altered or that the Petitioner might have such other relief
in
the premises as to Her Majesty the Queen in Her Court
of
Parliament might seem meet; as upon the case of the Director
of
Public Prosecutions in Northern Ireland (on behalf of
Her
Majesty) lodged in answer to the said Appeal; and
due
consideration had this day of what was offered on either side
in
this Cause:
It is Ordered and Adjudged, by
the Lords Spiritual and
Temporal in the Court of Parliament of Her
Majesty the Queen
assembled, That the said Order of Her Majesty's
Court of Appeal
in Northern Ireland of the 30th day of March 1994
complained of
in the said Appeal be, and the same is hereby,
Affirmed and that
the said Petition and Appeal be, and the
same is hereby,
dismissed this House: And it is further Ordered,
That the
certified question be answered as follows:
"On the facts stated and assuming no other
defence is
available, the soldier or police officer will be guilty
of
murder and not manslaughter."
Cler: Parliamentor:
HOUSE OF LORDS
OPINIONS
OF THE LORDS OF APPEAL
FOR JUDGMENT IN THE CAUSE
REGINA
v.
CLEGG
(APPELLANT)
(NORTHERN IRELAND)
ON 19TH JANUARY 1995
Lord Keith
of Kinkel
Lord Browne-Wilkinson
Lord Slynn of Hadley
Lord
Lloyd of Berwick
Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead
LORD KEITH OF KINKEL
My Lords,
For the reasons
given in the speech to be delivered by my noble and
learned friend
Lord Lloyd of Berwick, which I have read in draft and with
which I
agree, I would dismiss this appeal, and answer the certified
question
as he proposes.
LORD BROWNE-WIKINSON
My Lords,
For the reasons
given in the speech of my noble and learned friend
Lord Lloyd of
Berwick I too would dismiss the appeal.
LORD SLYNN OF HADLEY
My Lords,
I have had the
advantage of reading in draft the speech to be given by
my noble
and learned friend Lord Lloyd of Berwick. I agree that for
the
reasons he gives the appeal should be dismissed.
- 1 -
LORD LLOYD OF BERWICK
My Lords,
On the night of
30 September 1990 the appellant, Lee William Clegg,
a soldier
serving with the Parachute Regiment, was…
Continue reading R v Clegg
Sign in free to access the full text
- Case
- [1995] UKHL 1
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
AI summary not yet generated for this case.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.