R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor (Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening) (Nos 1 and 2)
Case
•
[2017] UKSC 51
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor (Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening) (Nos 1 and 2) [2017] UKSC 51
[2017] UKSC 51
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Supreme Court allowed appeals by the trade union UNISON and the Equality and Human Rights Commission against the lawfulness of fees imposed by the Lord Chancellor in respect of proceedings in employment tribunals and the employment appeal tribunal. The Fees Order had the effect of preventing access to justice, and was therefore unlawful under both English law and EU law. The imposition of fees could not be justified as a proportionate intrusion upon the right of access to justice, since the fees were not set at a level that everyone could afford, taking into account the availability of full or partial remission. The evidence showed that the Fees Order had had a particularly deterrent effect on the bringing of claims of low monetary value. The Supreme Court quashed the Fees Order.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Litigation & Procedure
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Standing
-
Limitation Periods
-
Specific Performance
-
Judicial Review
-
Natural Justice & Procedural Fairness
-
Statutory Interpretation
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
R (O) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] UKSC 3
Cases Citing This Decision
24
Commissioner of Corrective Services v Liristis
[2018] NSWCA 143
DC v Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services
[2017] NSWCA 225
Tamarin Pty Ltd & Otmoor Pty Ltd as trustee v Wicks
[2021] QCATA 146
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
0
North & Ors v Dumfries and Galloway Council (Scotland)
[2013] UKSC 45
North & Ors v Dumfries and Galloway Council (Scotland)
[2013] UKSC 45