McWilliams v Sir William Arrol & Company Ltd

Link copied
Case Copied 34 min read

    Parliamentary Archives,
    HL/PO/JU/4/3/1100

    Die Mercurii, 21° Februarii 1962

    After hearing Counsel, as well on Monday the 15th,
    as on Tuesday the 16th, days of January last, upon the
    Petition and Appeal of Mrs. Janet Wood Cummings or
    McWilliams, residing at 11 Rayne Place, Drumchapel,
    Glasgow, W.5, widow of the deceased William Francis
    McWilliams, steel erector, as an individual and as
    tutrix and administratrix in law of the pupil children
    aftermentioned: William Duncan McWilliams, Janette
    Cummings McWilliams, Marion McWilliams and
    Kenneth McWilliams, all residing with her at 11 Rayne
    Place, aforesaid, praying, That the matter of the Inter-
    locutors set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely, an
    Interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary in Scotland (Lord
    Guest), of the 15th of January 1960 and also an Inter-
    locutor of the Lords of Session there of the First Division,
    of the 17th of February 1961, might be reviewed before
    Her Majesty the Queen, in Her Court of Parliament,
    and that the said Interlocutors might be reversed, varied
    or altered, or that the Petitioner might have such other
    relief in the premises as to Her Majesty the Queen, in
    Her Court of Parliament, might seem meet; as also
    upon the Case of Sir William Arrol & Company Limited ;
    and also upon the Case of Lithgows Limited, lodged in
    answer to the said Appeal; and Counsel appearing for
    the Respondents, but not being called upon; and due
    consideration being had this day of what was offered
    for the said Appellant:

    It is Ordered and Adjudged, by the Lords Spiritual
    and Temporal, in the Court of Parliament of Her Majesty
    the Queen assembled, That the said Interlocutors, of the
    15th day of January 1960 and of the 17th day of February
    1961, complained of in the said Appeal, be, and the same
    are hereby, Affirmed, and that the said Petition and
    Appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed this House:
    And it is further Ordered, That the Appellant do pay,
    or cause' to be paid, to the said Respondents the Costs
    incurred by them in respect of the said Appeal, provided
    that such last-mentioned Order shall not be enforced
    without a further Order of this House.

    McWilliams (Widow, as an individual and as tutrix and admini- stratrix in law of the pupil children William Duncan McWilliams and others) (A.P.) v. Sir William Arrol & Company Limited and others.



    HOUSE OF LORDS

    McWILLIAMS (Widow, as an individual and as tutrix and administrate
    in law of the pupil children William Duncan McWilliams and others)
    (A.P.)

    v.

    SIR WILLIAM ARROL & COMPANY LIMITED and others

    21st February, 1962

    The Lord Chancellor

    Lord Chancellor
    Viscount Simonds
    Lord Reid
    Lord Morris of Borth-y-Gest
    Lord Devlin


    My Lords,

    This is an appeal against an interlocutor of the First Division of the Court
    of Session in Scotland dated 17th February, 1961, adhering to the interlocutor
    of the Lord Ordinary dated 15th January, 1960, in an action for damages
    raised by the Appellant as pursuer against the Respondents as defenders
    in…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read McWilliams v Sir William Arrol & Company Ltd and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[1962] UKHL 3
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.