Robb Evans of Robb Evans & Associates v European Bank Ltd
[2004] NSWCA 82
Citation 1
…39 In the Spycatcher case, the Court referred to the identification of the basis of the exclusionary rule by Lord Watson in Huntington v Attrill [1893] AC 150 at 156 in terms of the principle that all crimes are local. (See the Spycatcher case at 41.5.) The joint judgment went on, however, to expres…
R v Mark Jeffrey Winfield, Ian David Chandler and Edward Lipohar No. SCCRM 95/216 Judgment No. 5325 Number of Pages 40 Criminal Law (1995) 65 Sasr 121
[1995] SASC 5325
Citation 2
…81) 7 A Crim R 276; DPP v Stonehouse (1978) AC 55; Brownlie v SPCC (1992) 27 NSWLR 78, applied. Macleod v The Attorney-General for NSW (1891) AC 455; Huntington v Attrill (1893) AC 150; Libman v R (1985) 21 CCC (3d) 206; Mayer v Henderson (1993) 68 A Crim R 155: R v Cantanzariti and Ors (unreported, Judgment Number 5298, avai…
Attorney-General (United Kingdom) v Heinemann Publishers Australia Pty Ltd
[1988] HCA 25
Citation 3
…21. The associated rule with which we are presently concerned has traditionally been expressed as a bar to jurisdiction, although the rule might now be more correctly described as one rendering a claim unenforceable. The rule had its foundation in the notion "that crimes, including in that term all …