Guild v Inland Revenue Commissioners

Link copied
Case Copied 19 min read

    Parliamentary Archives,
    HL/PO/JU/18/252

    Guild (Executor Nominate of the late James Young Russell)
    (Appellant) v. Commissioners of Inland Revenue (Respondents)

    (Scotland)

    JUDGMENT

    Die Jovis 27° Februarii 1992

    Upon Report from the Appellate Committee to whom was
    referred the Cause Guild (Executor Nominate of the late James
    Young Russell) against the Commissioners of Inland Revenue,
    That the Committee had heard Counsel as well on Monday the
    27tn as on Tuesday the 28th days of January last upon the
    Petition and Appeal of David James Guild W.S. of 5 Rutland
    Square, Edinburgh, praying that the matter of the
    Interlocutors set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely
    Interlocutors of the Lords of Session in Scotland of the First
    Division of the 15th day of March 1991, might be reviewed
    before Her Majesty the Queen in Her Court of Parliament and
    that the said Interlocutors might be reversed, varied or
    altered or that the Petitioner might have such other relief in
    the premises as to Her Majesty the Queen in Her Court of
    Parliament might seem meet; as upon the case of the
    Commissioners of Inland Revenue lodged in answer to the said
    Appeal; and due consideration had this day of what was offered
    on either side in this Cause:

    It is Ordered and Adjudged, by the Lords Spiritual and
    Temporal in the Court of Parliament of Her Majesty the Queen
    assembled, That the said Interlocutors of the 15th day of
    March 1991 complained of in the said Appeal be, and the same
    are hereby, Recalled and that the determination of the
    Commissioners of Inland Revenue of the 8th day of June 1990 be
    Set Aside: And it is further Ordered, That the said Cause be
    and the same is hereby remitted back to the Court of Session
    in Scotland to proceed as accords: And it is further Ordered,
    That the Respondents do pay or cause to be paid to the said
    Appellant the Expenses incurred by him in respect of the
    Action in the Court of Session and also the Costs incurred by
    him in respect of the said Appeal to this House, the amount of
    such last-mentioned Costs to be certified by the Clerk of the
    Parliaments if not agreed between the parties: And is is also
    further Ordered, That unless the Costs certified as aforesaid
    shall be paid to the Appellant entitled to the same within one
    calendar month from the date of the Certificate thereof the
    Cause shall be, and the same is hereby, remitted back to the
    Court of Session in Scotland or to the Judge acting as
    Vacation Judge to issue such Summary Process or Diligence for
    the recovery of such Costs as shall be lawful and necessary.

    Cler: Parliamentor:

    Judgment: 27 February 1992

    HOUSE OF LORDS

    GUILD

    (EXECUTOR NOMINATE OF THE LATE JAMES YOUNG RUSSELL)

    (APPELLANT)

    v.

    COMMISSIONERS OF INLAND REVENUE

    (RESPONDENTS)

    (SCOTLAND)

    Lord Keith of Kinkel
    Lord Roskill
    Lord Griffiths
    Lord Jauncey of Tullichettle
    Lord Lowry

    LORD KEITH OF KINKEL

    My Lords,

    The late James Young Russell…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Guild v Inland Revenue Commissioners and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[1992] UKHL 16
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.