Parliamentary
Archives,
HL/PO/JU/18/252
Guild (Executor Nominate of the
late James Young Russell)
(Appellant) v. Commissioners of Inland
Revenue (Respondents)
(Scotland)
JUDGMENT
Die Jovis 27° Februarii 1992
Upon Report from the Appellate Committee to
whom was
referred the Cause Guild (Executor Nominate of the late
James
Young Russell) against the Commissioners of Inland
Revenue,
That the Committee had heard Counsel as well on Monday
the
27tn as on Tuesday the 28th days of January last upon
the
Petition and Appeal of David James Guild W.S. of 5
Rutland
Square, Edinburgh, praying that the matter of
the
Interlocutors set forth in the Schedule thereto,
namely
Interlocutors of the Lords of Session in Scotland of the
First
Division of the 15th day of March 1991, might be
reviewed
before Her Majesty the Queen in Her Court of Parliament
and
that the said Interlocutors might be reversed, varied
or
altered or that the Petitioner might have such other relief
in
the premises as to Her Majesty the Queen in Her Court
of
Parliament might seem meet; as upon the case of
the
Commissioners of Inland Revenue lodged in answer to the
said
Appeal; and due consideration had this day of what was
offered
on either side in this Cause:
It is Ordered and Adjudged, by
the Lords Spiritual and
Temporal in the Court of Parliament of Her
Majesty the Queen
assembled, That the said Interlocutors of the
15th day of
March 1991 complained of in the said Appeal be, and
the same
are hereby, Recalled and that the determination of
the
Commissioners of Inland Revenue of the 8th day of June 1990
be
Set Aside: And it is further Ordered, That the
said Cause be
and the same is hereby remitted back to the Court of
Session
in Scotland to proceed as accords: And it is further
Ordered,
That the Respondents do pay or cause to be paid to
the said
Appellant the Expenses incurred by him in respect of
the
Action in the Court of Session and also the Costs incurred
by
him in respect of the said Appeal to this House, the amount
of
such last-mentioned Costs to be certified by the Clerk of
the
Parliaments if not agreed between the parties: And is is
also
further Ordered, That unless the Costs certified as
aforesaid
shall be paid to the Appellant entitled to the same
within one
calendar month from the date of the Certificate thereof
the
Cause shall be, and the same is hereby, remitted back to
the
Court of Session in Scotland or to the Judge acting
as
Vacation Judge to issue such Summary Process or Diligence
for
the recovery of such Costs as shall be lawful and necessary.
Cler: Parliamentor:
Judgment: 27 February 1992
HOUSE OF LORDS
GUILD
(EXECUTOR NOMINATE OF THE LATE JAMES YOUNG RUSSELL)
(APPELLANT)
v.
COMMISSIONERS OF INLAND REVENUE
(RESPONDENTS)
(SCOTLAND)
Lord Keith
of Kinkel
Lord Roskill
Lord Griffiths
Lord Jauncey of
Tullichettle
Lord Lowry
LORD KEITH OF KINKEL
My Lords,
The late James Young Russell…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Guild v Inland Revenue Commissioners and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [1992] UKHL 16
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
AI summary not yet generated for this case.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.