Page: 1081↓
House of Lords.
(On Appeal From the Court of Appeal in England.)
(Before the
v.
Subject_Registered Design — New or Original — Infringement — Patents and Designs Act 1907 (7 Edw. VII, c. 29), sec. 49 (1) — Admission of Novelty and Originality — Effect of Admission.
Facts:
In an action for infringement of a registered design the defendants admitted the originality and novelty of the plaintiffs' design, but denied infringement.
Held that the Court was not bound by the admission, and that the design founded on had not the novelty or originality required to bring it within the statutory protection.
Opinion, on the question of infringement, per Earl of Halsbury, that the principles of patent law were inapplicable to designs, and that only exact reproduction of a design would amount to infringement.
The appellants were proprietors of a registered design and raised an action against the respondents to obtain injunction against an alleged infringement of the design. The respondents admitted the design to be new and original, but denied infringement, and judgment pronounced in the respondents' favour was affirmed by the Court of Appeal (Cozens-Hardy, M.R., and Buckley, L. J., diss. Fletcher Moulton, L.J.), on the ground that there was no infringement. Without calling on counsel for the respondents their Lordships gave considered judgment as follows:—
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Gramophone Co. Ltd v. Magazine Holder Co. and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [1911] UKHL 1081
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
AI summary not yet generated for this case.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.