Die Veneris, 8 Aprilis 1949
Parliamentary
Archives,
HL/PO/JU/4/3/995
HOUSE OF LORDS
GILMOUR
v.
COATS AND OTHERS
8th April, 1949.
Lord
Simonds
Lord
du
Parcq
Lord
Normand
Lord
Morton
of
Henryton
Lord Reid
Lord Simonds
MY LORDS,
The Appellant, Ethel Gilmour, is the present Prioress
of the Carmelite
Priory of St. Charles' Square, Notting Hill,
London. In that capacity she
appeals against a judgment of the
Court of Appeal, whereby that Court
dismissed an appeal from a
judgment of Mr. Justice Jenkins who had in
effect declared the
purposes of the Carmelite Priory not to be charitable
in the
technical sense which the law ascribes to that word.
The question arises in this way. By a declaration of
trust made on the
10th June, 1946, between the Respondent, Evelyn
Dudley Coats, of the one
part and herself and George Bellow
(therein called " the Trustees ") of the
other part a
sum of £500 cash was settled upon trust after payment of
costs
for investment as therein mentioned and to hold the resulting
trust
fund " Upon trust if the purposes of the Roman
Catholic Community situate
" and known as the Carmelite
Priory, St. Charles' Square, Notting Hill, in the
" County
of London, are charitable to apply the income of the Trust Fund
"
to all or any such purposes . . . but if the purposes of the said
com-
" munity are not charitable then upon trust to apply
the Trust Fund to all
" or any of the purposes of the
Converts' Aid Society of 20, Holmes Road,
" Twickenham,
Middlesex." This settlement was admittedly made for the
purpose
of raising the question which has now reached this House.
Accord-
ingly within a short time an originating summons was
issued in the Chancery
Division by the trustees, to which the
present Appellant and certain persons
representing the Converts'
Aid Society, who are the present Respondents,
were made
Defendants, asking how the trustees ought to apply the income
of
the trust fund. The question, though framed in this general way,
was
intended to raise the issue whether the purposes of the
Carmelite Priory
were charitable. For it was clear that the
settlement created a perpetuity
in favour of that community, so
that, if the purposes were not charitable,
the gift over in
favour of the Converts' Aid Society would take effect.
What then were the purposes of this Carmelite Priory,
which I will some-
times refer to as " the Convent " or
" the community "? Upon this matter
evidence was given
by the Appellant herself and by His Eminence Cardinal
Griffin,
the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Westminster. This evidence
is
stated at length in the very careful judgment of Mr. Justice Jenkins
and
1 will refer to certain salient features of it. The whole of
it has been care-
fully considered by the House.
It appears that this community is one of the
communities of the Discalced
Nuns of the Order of Our Blessed
Lady…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Gilmour v Coats and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [1949] UKHL 1
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
AI summary not yet generated for this case.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.