Gilmour v Coats

Link copied
Case Copied 42 min read

    Die Veneris, 8 Aprilis 1949

    Parliamentary Archives,
    HL/PO/JU/4/3/995

    HOUSE OF LORDS

    GILMOUR

    v.
    COATS AND OTHERS

    8th April, 1949.

    Lord
    Simonds

    Lord du
    Parcq

    Lord
    Normand

    Lord

    Morton of
    Henryton

    Lord Reid

    Lord Simonds

    MY LORDS,

    The Appellant, Ethel Gilmour, is the present Prioress of the Carmelite
    Priory of St. Charles' Square, Notting Hill, London. In that capacity she
    appeals against a judgment of the Court of Appeal, whereby that Court
    dismissed an appeal from a judgment of Mr. Justice Jenkins who had in
    effect declared the purposes of the Carmelite Priory not to be charitable
    in the technical sense which the law ascribes to that word.

    The question arises in this way. By a declaration of trust made on the
    10th June, 1946, between the Respondent, Evelyn Dudley Coats, of the one
    part and herself and George Bellow (therein called " the Trustees ") of the
    other part a sum of £500 cash was settled upon trust after payment of
    costs for investment as therein mentioned and to hold the resulting trust
    fund " Upon trust if the purposes of the Roman Catholic Community situate
    " and known as the Carmelite Priory, St. Charles' Square, Notting Hill, in the
    " County of London, are charitable to apply the income of the Trust Fund
    " to all or any such purposes . . . but if the purposes of the said com-
    " munity are not charitable then upon trust to apply the Trust Fund to all
    " or any of the purposes of the Converts' Aid Society of 20, Holmes Road,
    " Twickenham, Middlesex." This settlement was admittedly made for the
    purpose of raising the question which has now reached this House. Accord-
    ingly within a short time an originating summons was issued in the Chancery
    Division by the trustees, to which the present Appellant and certain persons
    representing the Converts' Aid Society, who are the present Respondents,
    were made Defendants, asking how the trustees ought to apply the income
    of the trust fund. The question, though framed in this general way, was
    intended to raise the issue whether the purposes of the Carmelite Priory
    were charitable. For it was clear that the settlement created a perpetuity
    in favour of that community, so that, if the purposes were not charitable,
    the gift over in favour of the Converts' Aid Society would take effect.

    What then were the purposes of this Carmelite Priory, which I will some-
    times refer to as " the Convent " or " the community "? Upon this matter
    evidence was given by the Appellant herself and by His Eminence Cardinal
    Griffin, the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Westminster. This evidence
    is stated at length in the very careful judgment of Mr. Justice Jenkins and
    1 will refer to certain salient features of it. The whole of it has been care-
    fully considered by the House.

    It appears that this community is one of the communities of the Discalced
    Nuns of the Order of Our Blessed Lady…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Gilmour v Coats and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[1949] UKHL 1
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.