Legal Research
Cases
E, R (on the application of) v Governing Body of JFS & Anor

E, R (on the application of) v Governing Body of JFS & Anor

Case [2009] UKSC 15

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

Case: [2009] UKSC 15
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Most Recent Citation

Cases Citing This Decision

Faruqi v Hanson [2024] FCA 1264
Citation 1

…izenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] HCA 37; 97 ALJR 1005 Regina (E) v Governing Body of JFS [2009] UKSC 15; [2010] 2 AC 728 Roberts v Bass [2002] HCA 57; 212 CLR 1 Saeed v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] HCA 23; 241 CLR 252 Silberberg v The Builders Collective of Australia Inc [2007] FCA 151…
Morris v Harness Racing New South Wales [2024] NSWCATAD 129
Citation 2 (Para 68)

…e application of E) v Governing Body of JFS (Secretary of State for Children, School and Families, interested parties) (United Synagogue intervening) [2009] UKSC 15; [2010] 1 All ER 319 five judges out of the nine upheld the judgment of the Court of Appeal on the issue of direct discrimination.…
R (Z) v Hackney London Borough Council [2020] UKSC 40
Citation 3

…court, by a majority, to have occurred in R (E) v Governing Body of JFS (United Synagogue intervening) [2009] UKSC 15; [2010] 2 AC 728 (“ JFS ”) in the context of the application of domestic anti-discrimination legislation, and that this means that she must be taken to have been subjected to direct discriminatio…
Darnley (Appellant) v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust (Respondent) [2018] UKSC 50
Citation 4

…t is also a well-established principle of equality law that the motive of the alleged discriminator is irrelevant: see, R (E) v Governing Body of JFS [2009] UKSC 15; [2010] 2 AC 728, eg at paras 13-20, citing R v Birmingham City Council, Ex p Equal Opportunities Commission [1989] AC 1155 and James v Eastleigh Bor…
Bull & Anor v Hall & Anor [2013] UKSC 73
Citation 5

…additional reason for the discrimination adds nothing. The important question, as Lord Phillips emphasised in R (E) v Governing Body of JFS [2009] UKSC 15, [2010] 2 AC 728, is what criterion was being employed by the service provider when granting a service to one and denying it to another. The reason for adoptin…
For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers [2025] UKSC 16
Citation 6

…was approved by Lord Mance JSC in R (E) v Governing Body of JFS [2009] UKSC 15, [2010] 2 AC 728 at para 85.) Applied in the context of a discrimination claim made by a trans woman (a biological male with or without a GRC), the claimant can claim sex discrimination because she is perceived as a woman and can compa…
Lee v Ashers Baking Company Ltd & Ors (Northern Ireland) (Rev 1) [2018] UKSC 49
Citation 7

…t is also a well-established principle of equality law that the motive of the alleged discriminator is irrelevant: see, R (E) v Governing Body of JFS [2009] UKSC 15; [2010] 2 AC 728, eg at paras 13-20, citing R v Birmingham City Council, Ex p Equal Opportunities Commission [1989] AC 1155 and James v Eastleigh Bor…
Z & Anor, R (on the application of) v Hackney London Borough Council & Anor (Rev 1) [2020] UKSC 40
Citation 8

…gin which was the same as that found by this court, by a majority, to have occurred in R (E) v Governing Body of JFS (United Synagogue intervening) [2009] UKSC 15; [2010] 2 AC 728 (“ JFS ”) in the context of the application of domestic anti-discrimination legislation, and that this means that she must be taken to…

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

R v A [2016] SASCFC 66
Citation 1

…Developing the same point in Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police v Khan [2001] UKHL 48, 1 WLR 1947, para 29, Lord Nicholls said that the question was:…
Belfast City Council v Miss Behavin' Ltd [2007] UKHL 19
Citation 2

…of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15, [2007] 1 AC 100 and Belfast City Council v Miss Behavin' Ltd [2007] UKHL 19, [2007] 1 WLR 1420 are the best examples, where it can be said in the human rights context that the fact that the public authority had applied its mind to the issue is immaterial. This is because in…
Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] UKHL 11
Citation 3

…ust also be considered: Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] UKHL 11; [2007] 2 AC 167, para. 19, per Lord Bingham of Cornhill. In the case of JFS, as an educational establishment maintained by a local education authority, its general duty was supplemented by specific duties under s.71 of the…
Begum, R (on the application of) v. Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15
Citation 4

…at it adopted were proportionate. There are cases, of which R(SB) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15, [2007] 1 AC 100 and Belfast City Council v Miss Behavin' Ltd [2007] UKHL 19, [2007] 1 WLR 1420 are the best examples, where it can be said in the human rights context that the fact that the public…
Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police v. Khan [2001] UKHL 48
Citation 5

…Developing the same point in Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police v Khan [2001] UKHL 48, 1 WLR 1947, para 29, Lord Nicholls said that the question was:…
Percy v. Church of Scotland Board of National Mission (Scotland) [2005] UKHL 73
Citation 6

…lusive jurisdiction and engaged in matters that are regulated by the civil courts. In Percy v Board of National Mission of the Church of Scotland [2005] UKHL 73, [2006] 2 AC 28, for example, the appellant was employed by the Board of Mission under a contract personally to execute work within the meaning of sectio…

AI Chat coming soon