Legal Research
Cases
Actavis Group PTC EHF & Ors v ICOS Corporation & Anor

Actavis Group PTC EHF & Ors v ICOS Corporation & Anor

Case [2019] UKSC 15

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

Case: [2019] UKSC 15
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Cases Citing This Decision

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Generics (UK) Ltd v H Lundbeck A/S [2009] UKHL 12
Citation 1

…or Medsystems Inc v Angiotech Pharmaceuticals Inc [2008] UKHL 49; [2008] 4 All ER 621, para 3 per Lord Hoffmann; Generics (UK) Ltd v H Lundbeck A/S [2009] UKHL 12; [2009] 2 All ER 955, para 35 per Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe; Dr Reddy’s Laboratories (UK) Ltd v Eli Lilly and Co Ltd [2010] RPC 9, para 102 per Lord…
Conor Medsystems Inc v Angiotech Pharmaceuticals Inc [2008] UKHL 49
Citation 2

…per Nicholls LJ; Actavis UK Ltd v Merck & Co Inc [2009] 1 WLR 1186, paras 45-48 per Jacob LJ; Conor Medsystems Inc v Angiotech Pharmaceuticals Inc [2008] UKHL 49; [2008] 4 All ER 621, para 3 per Lord Hoffmann; Generics (UK) Ltd v H Lundbeck A/S [2009] UKHL 12; [2009] 2 All ER 955, para 35 per Lord Walker of Gest…
Synthon BV (Appellants) v Smithkline Beecham plc (Respondents) (Html version) [2005] UKHL 59
Citation 3

…tter, common general knowledge, and that person’s uninventive skill in making trial and error experiments. In Synthon BV v SmithKline Beecham plc [2005] UKHL 59; [2006] 1 All ER 685, the House of Lords addressed and distinguished the concepts of disclosure and enablement in the context of a challenge to the valid…
Warner-Lambert Company LLC v Generics (UK) Limited (t/a Mylan) and ors [2018] UKSC 56
Citation 4

…nt Law” (1902) 18 LQR 280, 285 and cited by Lord Sumption in the leading judgment in Generics (UK) Ltd (trading as Mylan) v Warner-Lambert Co LLC [2018] UKSC 56; [2019] Bus LR 360, para 17).…
Eli Lilly and Company (Appellant) v Actavis UK Limited and others (Respondents) [2017] UKSC 48
Citation 5

…mann; Dr Reddy’s Laboratories (UK) Ltd v Eli Lilly (above) paras 79-82 per Jacob LJ, para 92 per Lord Neuberger MR; Actavis UK Ltd v Eli Lilly & Co [2017] UKSC 48; [2017] RPC 21, para 52 per Lord Neuberger.…
Human Genome Sciences Inc (Appellant) v Eli Lilly and Company (Respondent) [2011] UKSC 51
Citation 6

…ratories (UK) Ltd v Eli Lilly and Co Ltd [2010] RPC 9, para 102 per Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury MR; Eli Lilly and Co v Human Genome Sciences Inc [2011] UKSC 51; [2012] 1 All ER 1154; [2012] RPC 6, paras 83-87 per Lord Neuberger.…
Buchanan v. Alba Diagnostics Ltd [2004] UKHL 5
Citation 7

…ention which comes within the claims of an earlier patent but contains a further inventive step”: Buchanan v Alba Diagnostics Ltd [2004] UKHL 5; 2004 SC (HL) 9; [2004] RPC 34, para 32 per Lord Hoffmann. The use of well-known research tests of itself does not render such selections and improvements obvious.…
Datec Electronics Holdings Ltd & Ors v. United Parcels Services Ltd [2007] UKHL 23
Citation 8

…WLR 577, paras 14-17 per Clarke LJ, a statement which the House of Lords approved in Datec Electronic Holdings Ltd v United Parcels Service Ltd [2007] UKHL 23; [2007] 1 WLR 1325, para 46 per Lord Mance.…
B (a Child), Re [2013] UKSC 33
Citation 9

…is possible. It must be satisfied that the trial judge was wrong: see, by way of analogy, In re B (A Child) (Care Proceedings Threshold Criteria) [2013] UKSC 33; [2013] 1 WLR 1911, paras 90-93 per Lord Neuberger, para 203 per Lady Hale.…

AI Chat coming soon