Work v IAG NZ Ltd

[2025] NZSC 138

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND

I TE KŌTI MANA NUI O AOTEAROA

 SC 90/2025
 [2025] NZSC 138

BETWEEN	PETER ALLAN WORK AND ROBYN MARGARET WORK Applicants
AND	IAG NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Respondent

Court:	Glazebrook, Ellen France and Miller JJ
Counsel:	G J Jones and J Heatlie for Applicants C M Stevens, B R D Cuff and K E Weekly for Respondent
Judgment:	15 October 2025

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

AThe application for leave to adduce further evidence is dismissed.

BThe application for leave to file submissions in reply on the above application is dismissed.

CCosts are reserved.

____________________________________________________________________

REASONS

1. According to the earlier direction in this proceeding, the respondent has two weeks from the date of this judgment to file its submissions in opposition to leave.  The Court will then decide the leave application on the papers.  We will provide reasons for dismissing the applicants’ interlocutory applications in that judgment.

Solicitors:
Court One, Auckland for Applicants
Wotton Kearney, Wellington for Respondent