Woolworths New Zealand Limited v Auckland Council
[2022] NZSC 46
•13 April 2022
| IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND I TE KŌTI MANA NUI O AOTEAROA |
| SC 139/2021 [2022] NZSC 46 |
| BETWEEN | WOOLWORTHS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED |
| AND | AUCKLAND COUNCIL |
| SC 140/2021 | ||
| BETWEEN | FOODSTUFFS NORTH ISLAND LIMITED | |
| AND | AUCKLAND COUNCIL | |
| Court: | William Young, Glazebrook and Ellen France JJ |
Counsel: | J S Cooper QC and A W Braggins for Woolworths NZ Ltd |
Judgment: | 13 April 2022 |
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
ALeave to appeal is granted (Auckland Council v Woolworths New Zealand Ltd [2021] NZCA 484).
BLeave is granted to the Medical Officer of Health to appear as an interested party at the substantive hearing.
CThe approved question is whether the Court of Appeal was correct to allow the appeal and dismiss the cross-appeal.
____________________________________________________________________
REASONS
Although we grant leave to appeal in general terms, the Court is primarily interested in whether the Court of Appeal’s judgment proceeded on the basis that an appeal will only succeed if there is not a “real and appreciable possibility”[1] that the element of the provisional policy challenged will minimise alcohol-related harm (so that proportionality considerations are not material) and, if so, whether this is correct.
[1]Auckland Council v Woolworths New Zealand Ltd [2021] NZCA 484 (Kós P, Miller and Goddard JJ) at [53], [62] and [109].
The parties agreed that the Medical Officer of Health should be granted leave to appear and be heard as an interested party at the substantive appeal, should leave to appeal be granted. Leave is accordingly granted to the Medical Officer of Health to appear as an interested party at the substantive hearing.
Solicitors:
Berry Simons, Auckland for Woolworths New Zealand Ltd
DLA Piper, Auckland for Foodstuffs North Island Ltd
Simpson Grierson, Auckland for Auckland Council
Luke Cunningham Clere, Wellington for Auckland Medical Officer of Health
0
1
0