Watercare Services Limited
[2017] NZHC 2981
•1 December 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE
CIV-2017-404-292 [2017] NZHC 2981
UNDER the Declaratory Judgments Act 1908 AND
UNDER
the Judicature Act 1908
AND
IN THE MATTER
of s 191(3) and Schedule 12 of the Local
Government Act 2002IN THE MATTER
of an application by WATERCARE SERVICES LIMITED
Applicant
Hearing: 9 October 2017 Appearances:
R J Somerville QC, B S Carruthers and A M Cameron for the
Applicant
J Caldwell as amicus curiae with K DawsonJudgment:
1 December 2017
JUDGMENT OF WOODHOUSE J (Result)
This judgment was delivered by me on 1 December 2017 at 4:00 p.m. pursuant to r 11.5 of the High Court Rules 2016.
Registrar/Deputy Registrar
Solicitors / Counsel:
Dr R J Somerville QC, Barrister, Dunedin
Ms B S Carruthers and Mr A M Cameron (applicant’s instructing solicitor), Russell McVeagh, Auckland
Ms J Caldwell and Ms K Dawson, Buddle Findlay, Auckland
RE WATERCARE SERVICES LTD [2017] NZHC 2981 [1 December 2017]
[1] On the application of Watercare Services Ltd for declarations, on the terms as amended at the hearing, I make the declarations sought, as follows:
(a) On a proper construction of section 181(3) of the Local Government Act 2002 (the Act), if there is a change of owner after written consent has been given, it is not necessary either to obtain the written consent from the subsequent owner or give the subsequent owner notice under Schedule 12(1)(b) of the Act of the intention to construct the works before the work is done.
(b)On a proper construction of Schedule 12 of the Act, if there is a change of owner after notice has been given under clause 1(b) of the Schedule, it is not necessary to give notice to any subsequent owner before the work is done.
[2] The reasons for this decision will follow.
Woodhouse J
0
1