IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE
CIV-2018-404-2570
[2019] NZHC 909
UNDER the Insolvency Act 2006 IN THE MATTER OF
the bankruptcy of Colleen Anne Warin and an application to set aside a bankruptcy notice
BETWEEN
MARIAN RUTH WARIN
Judgment Creditor
AND
COLLEEN ANNE WARIN
Judgment Debtor
Hearing: 29 April 2019 Appearances:
M W Anderson for the Judgment Creditor Colleen Anne Warin, Judgment Debtor in person
Judgment:
7 May 2019
INTERIM JUDGMENT OF ASSOCIATE JUDGE R M BELL
This interim judgment was delivered by me on 7 May 2019 at 3:00pm
pursuant to Rule 11.5 of the High Court Rules.
…………………………………
Deputy Registrar
Solicitors:
Thomas Dewar Sziranyi Letts (M W Anderson), Wellington, for the Judgment Creditor
Copy for:
Colleen Anne Warin, PO Box 519, Oneroa, Waikehe Island, Auckland
MARIAN RUTH WARIN v COLLEEN ANNE WARIN [2019] NZHC 909 [7 May 2019]
[1] Colleen Anne Warin, the judgment debtor, applies to set aside the bankruptcy notice of her mother, Marian Ruth Warin. The amount payable under the bankruptcy notice is $206,078.83. It is based on a judgment debt of $191,984.33 given in the High Court at Wellington on 26 April 2017,1 plus interest on the judgment. Colleen was served on 3 December 2018. She filed and served her application on 17 December 2018. The application is within time. Under r 24.10 of the High Court Rules 2016, the time for complying with the notice has been extended until her setting-aside application is decided. Colleen has appeared for herself. She did have legal representation in the proceeding in which judgment was given against her and she has had some legal advice since the judgment was given against her.
[2] Marian now lives with her son, Nigel, in Midland, Perth, Western Australia, although in the entituling her address is given as her former home in Te Puke. Marian is 88 years old. Colleen says that Marian lacks capacity and is under the control and influence of Nigel.
[3] Colleen’s application to set aside the bankruptcy notice is wide-ranging, but the main points are these:
(a)She says that Marian lacks capacity and that Nigel has undue influence over her, which he uses for his own personal benefit.
(b)Colleen wants to cross-examine Marian to establish her lack of capacity.
(c)The lawyers acting for Marian failed to disclose that Marian left New Zealand in December 2016.
(d)Colleen ought not to have to pay interest on the debt.
(e)An adjudication in bankruptcy would cause Colleen undue hardship. While she has assets, she has not been able to sell them at prices that would enable her to clear her indebtedness.
Background
[4] Colleen is the only daughter of Marian and Trevor Warin. She has two brothers, Wayne and Nigel. Trevor is in his nineties and has dementia. Wayne holds an enduring power of attorney for him. Nigel has lived in Western Australia for over 20 years and has…
Continue reading Warin v Warin
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Warin v Warin [2019] NZHC 909
- Case
- [2019] NZHC 909
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.